This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LIFTING EQUIPMENT


The reconstruction of four rail bridges in north east London in the autumn required some deft lifting work, the relocation of some residents, and an awful lot of engineering prowess across four tight possession windows. RTM speaks to Network Rail’s scheme project manager Jagjit Singh.


F


our weak bridges on the Gospel Oak to Barking line from north to east Lon-


don had to be replaced last year to ensure Network Rail met its licence obligations, as the 120-year-old structures did not meet the published RA of the route.


Although all four – at Vansittart Road, Pe- vensey Road, Thorpe Road and Skeltons Lane – were identical structurally, making the work simpler than it may have been, they are also all located in residential areas with very dense housing.


This made the communications and public relations aspects of the work as big a chal- lenge as the engineering, according to Net- work Rail’s scheme project manager Jagjit Singh, who said: “We wanted to maintain a good working relationship with the resi- dents, especially when we were doing lift- ing work over their private property.”


Preparatory works started on site in 46 | rail technology magazine Dec/Jan 12


February 2010, by which time residents had already had extensive information on the upcoming works and the fact that some of them were to be relocated to hotels if they chose, because of the noisy demolition and construction works.


Following enabling works to extend the bridges’ abutments, on Network Rail land, the main works were done over four con- secutive weekends in September and Octo- ber, with three possessions of 52 hours and a final one of 28 hours, during which the tracks were welded and stressed.


Singh said: “The methodology was the same for all the bridges, because all four structures were very similar – in fact they were exactly the same in terms of their con- struction.


“The main challenge was the location of the bridges. They were located in residen- tial areas, with houses very close by. That created a number of issues, for instance the piling works that had to be done to extend the abutments. The piling works were done at once, and as part of that we had to do a condition survey on all the houses.


“We also had to use cranes to do lifting over


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92