TRACK EQUIPMENT & MAINTENANCE
rail sector works by Railtrack (and Network Rail) and their contractors created a paro- chial isolationist decision hierarchy driv- ing poor quality slow decisions based on historic and anecdotal experiences when selecting or agreeing to the use of trench- less systems and techniques on their local rail networks.
Following ‘Railtex’ last year, UKSTT and its members continue to demonstrate to the rail industry their willingness and enthusi- asm to meet the challenges of working on rail infrastructure projects throughout the UK.
In addition to the significant amount of work in other sectors, many companies en- gaged within the trenchless industry, who work alongside major contractors or di- rectly with rail infrastructure owners, have Achilles Link-Up and are approved to work with rail infrastructure companies.
The technologies have developed tremen- dously over the years. Cured in place pipe lining systems (CIPP) have improved, ena- bling the use of air and steam to invert lin- ers as well as ultraviolet light curing, mak- ing the process much faster and quicker, which results in less disruption – which is the whole idea.
With rail operators loath to implement maintenance works that cause lengthy delays or require alternate routes causing inconvenience to commuters, these trench- less systems are ideal for an industry that has huge infrastructure maintenance li- abilities.
The rail sector has tended to neglect track- side drainage and sub grade. Some of them are eight to ten metres underground so they are easily forgotten. However, with the Environment Agency recently recognis- ing that some of these culverts are causing underground flooding, culverts will have to be thoroughly assessed, as will trackside drainage.
This should bring more business opportu- nities for the trenchless industry, includ- ing the possibility of working with London
44 | rail technology magazine Dec/Jan 12
T Efforts being made by the United Kingdom Society for Trenchless Technology (UKSTT) to educate and inform rail
here is a perception that the historical- ly fragmented local-based approach to
industry engineering staff and their contractors are essential, says Peter Crouch, UKSTT Technical Secretary, who here reviews the steps being made to improve and update industry awareness of trenchless capability and proven track record in the rail sector.
which have enabled adjacent assets to be repaired with little or no loss of line access or availability to the rail operator. That is once they understood the proposed trench- less system as well as the overall approach to the works.
It must be clearly stated that safety is first in everyone’s minds but frustrations in having to re-persuade each rail engineer in each rail network area every time a trench- less system is proposed that it is proven, safe, and reliable is inefficient, costly, and frustrating.
Underground. Infrastructure owners will be forced to place higher priority on this work where some brick culverts have been in place for 80 to 100 years and a collapse would mean serious problems.
Our focus is also on the need to educate and update the rail industry about the proven capabilities of trenchless systems,
Perhaps the latest reorganisation of the industry will offer opportunity to educate through seminar and roadshow attend- ance by rail owners, engineers and their contractors. To capture this opportunity, UKSTT will be running a series of articles in RTM introducing the society and offer- ing an overview of the technology, followed by articles with case studies on various techniques including pipe bursting,
pipe
lining and auger bor- ing.
Peter Crouch
FOR MORE INFORMATION Visit
www.ukstt.org.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92