COMMENT
Kate Ashley reports on the case for electrification of the Midlands Main Line, and why this upgrade is well over-due.
been electrified, and there are still no cur- rent plans to implement any upgrades in this spending control period – although the Initial Industry Plan for CP5, 2014-2019, does propose some investment.
T
This is something that the South Yorkshire PTE and East Midlands Councils are push- ing for strongly. Following the launch of a report outlining the case for the upgrade, a letter has been sent to Transport Secretary Justine Greening urging her to consider making the investment.
This letter states: “We believe that the clas- sic rail network has an important role to play, and it is vitally important to our fu- ture competitiveness and economic growth of our city regions.”
The case for electrification is based on six key points: improving journey times, ca- pacity and reliability; providing good value for money; generating significant economic benefits; supporting future population growth and regeneration; reducing CO2 emissions; and providing the first step to- wards an improved strategic network.
Journey times between London and Shef- field could be reduced by 13-14 minutes, and electric trains would provide far great- er reliability and the ability to introduce improved rolling stock.
Additionally, connecting four of the UK’s largest cities, all with rapidly increasing populations, could increase business op- portunities and create economic value of approximately £450m over the 60 year appraisal period, according to the report. Upgrading the railway would also facilitate greater regeneration in these areas, thus helping to rebalance the economy.
24 | rail technology magazine Dec/Jan 12
he Midland Main Line (MML) is the only main line to London that has not
ESTIMATED COSTS Line speed improvements £69m MML electrification c. £500m Derby station improvements £61-66m Sheffield station improvements £19-21m Market Harborough line speed improvements £21m Train lengthening £33-35m Total £703-712m
CO2 emissions could be reduced from cur- rent levels by around 40% and Network Rail estimates that £30m could be saved annually in operating costs, resulting in a high benefit to cost ratio.
Derby and Sheffield stations would be up- graded, re-modelling the track and extend- ing platforms to enable services with longer trains. Line speed improvements are also needed to fill in ‘gaps’ between Sheffield and Leeds and at Market Harborough.
Other changes would include electrifying track from Bedford to Sheffield via Leices- ter and Derby, Trent Junction to Notting- ham and Kettering to Corby. Nottingham to Chesterfield via Langley Mill would also benefit from electrification.
The report recommends that these im- provements must be delivered ahead of HS2, and should be seen as preparations, not alternative measures. If approved, the scheme could be completed by 2020.
Cllr David Parsons, chair of East Midlands Councils said: “This report completely justi- fies the investment and improvement in the Midland Main Line. Local government in the East Midlands is behind it, local businesses are behind it and I hope that Westminster and the Department for Transport will also put their weight behind this vital project.”
Simon Carr of the Sheffield City Region Local Enterprise Partnership said at the launch of the report: “It is a project long overdue – more money has been spent on improving car parks on the West Coast Main Line in the past five years than on the whole of the Midland Main Line, and it is time to redress that balance.”
FOR MORE INFORMATION Visit
tinyurl.com/MML-upgrade
Alvey & Towers
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92