This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
data published by Lucke et al. (2009), with the TTS to PTS extrapolation following the methodology outlined by Southall et al. (2007). The ranges for the onset of auditory injury in pinnipeds are based on the injury criteria by Southall et al. (2007) and are founded on data for a harbour or common seal Phoca vitulina (Kastak et al. 2005). It should be noted that prolonged exposure to repeated hammer strikes would increase the range over which injury might occur as described in Section 9.4.6.


99.


Potential ranges for the onset of instantaneous auditory injury for marine mammals during impact piling at East Anglia THREE are indicated in Table 9.6 to Table 9.9. Based on the injury criteria from Southall et al. (2007) the potential ranges where an instantaneous onset of auditory injury may occur span less than 500m for mid- frequency cetaceans, low-frequency cetaceans and pinnipeds in water. Assuming the sensitive receptor responds to the onset of pile driving by swimming away from the acoustic source (JNCC 2010), the potential for the onset of auditory injury would be expected to be mitigated by the 500m mitigation zone. For harbour porpoise the equivalent estimate is less than 1,000m from the pile, and is shorter for the lower hammer strike energies, with impact ranges no more than about 500m from the pile for hammer blow energies up to at least 2,300kJ (Table 9.6). Assuming a minimum 20 minute soft-start, a harbour porpoise swimming away at 0.5m/s (considered as slow, cruising swim speeds for harbour porpoise (e.g. Otani et al. 2000; Akamatsu et al. 2007)) would swim a distance of 600m. Considering this movement away from the source, and given that the 2,300 kJ hammer strike energy would not be exceeded during the minimum soft-start period, an instantaneous onset of auditory injury for harbour porpoise may be expected to be mitigated by the soft-start.


100. There are no known cases where marine mammal mortality has been reported as a direct result of noise exposure from windfarm construction or other acoustic sources of similar characteristics and SL. The predicted noise levels in close proximity to the pile are comparable to those estimated for the onset of auditory injury and mortality would only be expected at noise levels substantially above those necessary to cause auditory injury. The pile driving installation is thus unlikely to result in radiated noise levels sufficient to cause instantaneous mortality in marine mammals beyond a few metres from the pile, (Richardson et al. 1995 (converted from Yelverton et al. (1975) for marine mammals)).


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Appendix 9.1 Underwater Noise Modelling 36


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150