This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
East Anglia ONE 6.2.3. Mammals and chelonians


A recent demonstration of electroreception of AC fields in a dolphin (Czech-Damal et al 2011) suggests the widely held belief that cetaceans are not sensitive to E fields may be incorrect. However, the authors state that the system appears to be far less sensitive than those used by elasmobranchs (a 460µV/m threshold of sensitivity was established, approximately three orders of magnitude lower than elasmobranchs). In addition to their predominantly pelagic life histories, cetaceans are therefore expected to be unaffected by E fields induced by EAONE cables. Chelonians are also expected to be unaffected, both due to no evidence of electrical sensitivity and their pelagic life histories.


6.3. Sea electrodes


Should sea electrodes be utilised during cable maintenance, once magnitude and propagation distances of EMF, and duration of use are determined, possible factors such as avoidance of strong fields at the anode, involuntary attraction to the cathode (galvanotaxis), in addition to the production of toxic substances such as chlorine and halogenated compounds at the anode via electrolysis should be investigated.


8. Cumulative considerations


It is important to consider possible cumulative EMF effects of different cables, both within the EAONE Project, and with pre-existing operational cables at the site.


The worst-case scenario when considering the number of EAONE cables is Option 2 (see Section 2.1) with 550km of array cabling, 13 HVAC cables measuring 10km each, and 4 HVDC cables measuring 100km each. There is potential for additive or subtractive (cancelling) effects upon EMF, depending upon distance between cables and direction of alignment. B and iE fields predicted for array cabling (three-core 33kV to 75kV AC) are relatively weak, and therefore any potential additive effects are likely to be negligible. The higher rated cables most likely to be utilised for HVAC export cabling (three-core 132kV or 220kV) are expected to generate moderately stronger EMF, but any potential additive effects are only likely to extend a few to 10 meters from overlapping EMF zones, therefore deploying such cables 50m apart (as planned) should prevent such effects. Overlapping EMF zones are likely to be larger when considering single-core 275kV cabling, especially if deployed separately rather than in a trefoil, but such technology is unlikely to be utilised. HVDC cabling EMF may generate reasonably strong EMF in close proximity of cables, especially if considering separated deployment, with potential additive effects extending to tens of meters. Bundling of cables would markedly reduce overlapping EMF zones to just a few meters at most, and deploying sets of bundled cables 50m apart should prevent such effects.


The export HVDC cable corridor passes across two operational sub-sea cables either side of the halfway mark between the proposed EAONE site and the landfall north of Felixstowe. According to engineers, HVDC cables crossing HVAC cables are required to do so perpendicularly to prevent induced currents (iE field) resulting in thermal hotspots and de-rating of the cable. The EAONE export cable corridor is


J3184 EAONE v2 33


EMF Assessment


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150