This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
(1984) and a number of studies reported by Worcester (2006) have also demonstrated avoidance response when close to the sound source. Blaxter et al. (1981) also showed that when ramping up the sound level from a lower level, the sound level required to elicit a response is higher than if they are exposed to the same level from the onset, even if the ramp is only over two cycles. This may have implications for the use of soft-start during piling where the sound level is expected to gradually increase with time.


79. Although no behavioural disturbance criteria have been established, Washington State Department of Transportation, who do specify a requirement for the FHWG interim criteria for fish injury to be followed, also provide guidance in their Biological Assessment manual (WSDOT 2011) for behaviour effects in the form of a disturbance threshold which is based on work by Hastings (2002). The recommended threshold is 150dB re 1 μPa RMS, where the RMS refers to the root-mean squared pressure over the duration of the pulse. The authors do not provide peak or peak-to-peak levels and it is not possible to convert any relationship between peak pressure level and RMS levels as this will depend on the propagation distance and will be heavily influenced by water depths, which are generally very shallow for the previous pile- driving studies in the United States of America.


80.


The most comprehensive study identified observing fish behaviour when exposed to an impulsive type noise source was carried out by Curtin University in Australia for the oil and gas industry by McCauley et al. (2000a and 2000b). This study exposed various fish species in large cages to a seismic airgun and assessed behaviour, physiological and pathological changes. Both the acoustic and biological methodologies are described in detail. The study made a number of observations:





• •


• •


A general fish behavioural response to move to the bottom of the cage during periods of high level exposure (greater than RMS levels of around 156- 161dB re 1 μPa).


A greater startle response by small fish to the above levels.


A return to normal behavioural patterns some 14 to 30minutes after airgun operations ceased.


No significant physiological stress increases attributed to air gun exposure.


Some preliminary evidence of damage to the hair cells when exposed to the highest levels, although it was determined that such damage would only likely occur at short range from the source (further discussed in McCauley et al. 2003).


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Appendix 9.1 Underwater Noise Modelling 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150