The Importance of Implementing a Drug Abuse Recognition Program
BY KEITH GRAVES, GRAVES & ASSOCIATES
In 2013, a heavy equipment operator with a lengthy rap sheet was accused of being high on marijuana while operating an excavator that caused a downtown Philadelphia building to collapse onto a thrift store, killing six people.1
This is
one of many accidents where drugs have caused significant injury or death. But, how do you prevent a drugged employee from starting work? Drug testing in the workplace is a good start, but what if the employee shows up to work high? What kind of training do key people in your workplace have in identifying signs of drug impairment? Another issue is reasonable suspicion testing. How do you articulate your suspicion that you think an employee may be high? What if an employee is using a drug that is not covered under their workplace drug testing protocols and he/she continually comes back with a negative drug test, even though you could have sworn that he/she looked high?
tested for drugs or if they want to be aware of employee drug use. Kevin Reynolds, a seasoned narcotics detective in California, said, “Almost every drug user I come across has a job. Many times, they tell me that they are using drugs at work with their co-workers.” In California, a group of officers
S
developed a program to help cops on the street determine if they were dealing with someone under the influence of a drug. Tis program, the Drug Abuse Recognition Course (DAR), became a flexible, modular program that has been brought to thousands of officers throughout California. Te
www.datia.org
uffice it to say, knowledge of drugs is very important to anyone who is deciding if employees need to be
program was developed in the late 1980s by the Glendale Police Department and was rolled out to the rest of the state thanks to a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety. Although DAR is not the only drug influence program, it is by far the most popular method of detecting drug influence with minimal training. Other programs, like the Drug Recognition Expert Program, require multiple weeks of training and most require that you are a sworn law enforcement officer or approved safety official to participate, according to the DECP website. Te DAR process uses 7 steps to
determine if a person is actively high. A drug test will show past use, but the DAR process shows if a person is actually high
in the moment. In addition to the 7-step process, DAR breaks down all drugs into one of eight drug categories (see Figure 1). As an example, methamphetamine, cocaine and bath salts all have the same signs and symptoms. Tey all dilate the pupils, increase the pulse rate and cause the user to be hyperactive. All of these drugs are classified as (Central Nervous System (CNS) Stimulants. Students are taught the signs and symptoms associated with each class of drug. But, what if you did a drug test and it
came back negative? In this scenario, you correctly identified that the person was under the influence of a CNS Stimulant, but your company only tests for methamphetamine and cocaine. You can go back and now test for other known CNS Stimulants if you are allowed to do that in your policy. DAR instructors quickly realized that the
civilian workplace needed this same training. Te instructors tweaked the program and began to teach private entities the same material, in a shorter version, to assist them with identifying persons under the influence of drugs. Students in the DAR course are taught to look for signs and symptoms of drug influence in an atempt to develop probable cause to make an arrest and make a solid court case. People in private industry need similar skills to develop cause to send people in for reasonable suspicion testing.
datia focus 13
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60