This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS


Genomics Sorting through the damage


A high-throughput sequencing strategy allows scientists to follow cancer’s trail of genomic destruction


Cancer can leave the genome in a shambles. This is because when healthy cells become cancerous, their DNA can undergo dramatic structural rearrangements (see image), including sizeable duplications, insertions and deletions. Scientists hope to ‘zero in’ on the early events that drive tumorigenesis by mapping these changes, but existing methods have proven too expensive or time- consuming for performing large-scale analyses. Fortunately, next-generation DNA sequencing technology that could tackle massive amounts of genomic data is now becoming accessible. Axel Hillmer and Yijun Ruan at the A*STAR Genome Institute of Singapore have recently employed such technology to map cancer-associated chromosomal alterations with unprec- edented detail and accuracy1


.


Their method entails fragmenting chromosomal DNA into pieces of narrowly defined lengths, sequencing each fragment from both ends, and comparing the resulting genome with a ‘reference genome’ from a healthy individual. “Our technique is highly sensitive and could identify structural variations (SVs) in the genome at low sequencing costs,” says Ruan. The researchers analyzed the genomes of normal and cancer-


ous cell lines, including breast and stomach cancer cell lines, and assembled comprehensive maps of SVs. They found that both normal and cancerous cell lines exhibit structural rearrange- ments, but cancerous cells were particularly likely to accumulate certain types of SVs, such as tandem duplications, in which normally unique DNA sequences are repeated sequentially many times. “We think tandem duplications are good candidates for trig-


gering genomic instability,” says Hillmer. “Highly amplified rear- rangement points could help to identify ‘driver’ events that have tumorigenic properties.” Indeed, Ruan, Hillmer and their co-workers found striking


evidence that certain SVs act as focal starting points for the accumulation of additional rearrangements in the same chro- mosomal ‘neighborhood’, suggesting a potential mechanism for cancerous transformation. However, the researchers did not observe any obvious pattern for the distribution of these driver sites. Ruan suggests that it will be necessary to examine many


A*STAR RESEARCH OCTOBER 2011– MARCH 2012


Interphase nucleus showing amplification and fusion of breakpoint flanking sequences. Double signals (filled arrowheads) indicate the fusion of the two loci and single signals indicate the normal genomic distance (open arrowheads).


more samples to understand whether these specifically arise at physically fragile chromosomal sites or if these events instead emerge via disparate disruptions of common chromosome main- tenance pathways. Ruan and Hillmer are keen to further optimize the cost and speed of their technique in order to perform such analyses in the future. In addition, they believe that with further improvements, such analyses might also reach the clinic relatively soon. “We expect that within a few years, our approach or similar genome sequencing methods will be applied as a routine test to deter- mine patients’ cancer predisposition and tumor characteristics,” says Hillmer.





1. Hillmer, A. M. et al. Comprehensive long-span paired-end-tag mapping reveals characteristic patterns of structural variations in epithelial cancer genomes. Genome Research 21, 665–675 (2011).


39


© 2011 CSH Press


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96