CELL BIOLOGY & IMMUNOLOGY
Immunology Monocytes are not all the same
Understanding the differences between various monocyte subtypes could aid diagnosis of blood disorders
White blood cells called monocytes can be divided into three subtypes according to their gene expression patterns. Siew Cheng Wong and co-workers at the A*STAR Singapore Immunology Network and Bioinformatics Institute1
have conducted gene
expression profiling on human monocytes and identified several defining features that distinguish one subtype from the other. Monocytes play a number of important roles in the immune
system, including defence against pathogens and maintenance of tissue homeostasis. The traditional classification system used to divide monocytes into two subtypes according to their surface protein expression. The latest classification system, approved by the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Immunological Societies, divides monocytes into three subtypes: classical, intermediate and non-classical. Classical monocytes are monocytes with a high level of CD14
expression. They account for approximately 85% of the total monocyte population. Intermediate monocytes are monocytes with high CD14 and low CD16 expressions. They account for approximately 5% of the total monocyte population. Non-classical monocytes are monocytes with low CD14 and high CD16 expressions. They account for the remaining 10% of the total monocyte population. Different monocyte subtypes are known to have different gene expression patterns, but the exact details have yet to be elucidated. Wong and her team purified monocytes from the blood of
healthy donors, isolated RNA from the samples and used micro- array technology to profile the expression level of each gene. They used a technique called flow cytometry to examine the expression level of each cell surface protein. The researchers then analyzed the production of small signal-
ling molecules called cytokines and chemokines by each subtype in response to lipopolysaccharide, a cell-wall component found on gram-negative bacteria. They found that at the molecular level, intermediate and non-classical monocytes are very closely related to each other. One way to distinguish between the two monocyte subtypes is to use novel cell surface markers, such as ‘MHC Class II’ molecules. Another way to distinguish between different monocyte subtypes is by gene markers. Non-classical monocytes,
10 Classical monocytes
Intermediate monocytes Non-classical monocytes
Monocytes are divided into three subtypes according to CD14 and CD16 expression
for instance, express high levels of genes involved in cytoskeletal re-arrangements, whereas intermediate monocytes express highest levels of genes involved in T cell interactions. In addition, classical monocytes express the broadest range of receptor genes, and genes involved in tissue repair and immune response. The findings could have important clinical implications, as the
differences in gene expression between the subtypes could aid diagnosis of blood cancers and other haematological disorders. “The proportion of CD16 monocytes increases in many disease conditions,” says Wong. “We therefore plan to analyze monocyte subtypes in different disease conditions. This way, new diagnostic and therapeutic markers can be revealed, and the involvement of monocyte subtypes in specific diseases could be better clarified.” ■
1. Wong, K. L. et al. Gene expression profiling reveals the defining features of the classical, intermediate and nonclassical human monocyte subsets. Blood 118, e16–e31 (2011).
A*STAR RESEARCH OCTOBER 2011– MARCH 2012
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96