This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
10


*#$ $"%#'' %# &$ !" $##&"  $!"$!" ! #$ " "#" $#+


The project is an important development for Seaton, in the east of Devon


Demetriou adds: “The dredging process involved a 12-week


enabling programme, which included installing the pipeline and temporary bridges across public highways, as well as the con- struction of the reception pits. The actual dredging process itself took just four weeks to complete with all the material derived from licensed underwater sea quarries.” Each load was turned around in 36 hours with approximately


13 cu m of sand and aggregates pumped ashore every second. To receive each load, ISG’s team built two reception pits and a main lagoon that were surrounded by 4m high earth mounds. The pits and lagoon were lined with a geotextile membrane to prevent any issues with contamination of the existing ground with regard to salinity. Each load delivered 14,000 cu m of sand and gravel. With that


delivery came another 25,000 cu m of seawater and the entire payload went into one of the reception pits and the water made


its way to the lagoon controlled by water boxes. With the pump and pipeline needing to be constantly monitored in case of blockages, this meant through the night working for the con- struction team during deliveries. The sand needed the seawater to prevent blockages in the


pipe, but once delivered the 25,000 cu m of seawater from each delivery had to be safely removed from the site. ISG brought in two V12 engines and this process took between four and five hours, while the site team used a fleet of kit, including four 45- tonne excavators, blades and three powered rollers to disperse the sand. For the initially wary locals, the innovative method used to fill


the site proved an attraction. ISG erected a viewing platform and around 1,500 people a week would come to watch as the 300,000 cu m of sand was pumped on site. To reduce settlement issues with regard to the existing


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60