This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
METHODOLOGY 21


suitable instruments. Another method is the fixed-effect method from panel data analysis, where the assumption is that unobserved differences between the two groups are constant over time and are correlated with the indepen-


dent variables xj, which are also correlated with the unobserved individual specific effect αj. More recent methods, such as experimental and quasi- experimental methods, try to establish alternative scenarios that represent


the counterfactual situation by ensuring that the composition of the two groups remains the same over the course of the treatment. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages given the practical difficulties of testing the validity of the assumptions and cost implications and the quantitative requirements, among others, that are associated with using the different methods. In this study we use a combined matching and panel regression approach within a two-stage procedure to estimate the impact of the NAADS program on several outcome indicators. To generate greater confidence in the policy implications of our results, however, we also present results from using some of the other individual methods. We next present the individual methods to set the context, followed by our combined matching and panel regression approach.


Difference-in-Differences Method


Assuming that the outcome indicator of interest was growing or changing at the same rate between the treatment group and the control group prior to the treatment, the difference-in-differences (DID) or double differencing method, which measures the average gain or change in the outcome y over time in the treatment group less the average gain or change in the outcome y over time in the control group, can be used (Ravallion 2008). Albeit simple, this method removes biases in the comparison between the two groups that may be due to permanent differences between the two groups (e.g., location effect), as well as biases from comparison over time in the treatment group that may be due to time trends unrelated to the treatment. The impact of the NAADS program using this method can be obtained by estimating a difference equation of Equation 3.2 by OLS methods simply without the covariates, xj, as follows:


Δyj = α ˆ + δ ˆDIDNAADSj + yjt0 + ej, (3.4)


where Δyj = yt1 - yt0, and yt0 and yt1 are the outcomes in the initial and later periods, respectively. The method can be extended to include the covariates,


xj, as shown in Equation 3.5: Δyj = α


ˆ + β ˆ′DIDTΔxj + δ ˆDIDTNAADSj + yjt0 + ej. (3.5)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192