This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FEATURE MICRO MOULDING


MANUFACTURING THE IMPOSSIBLE: The next generation of micro moulding


Ultrasion explores the capabilities of the latest new micro moulding process, based on the use of ultrasonics to melt the polymer, bringing distinct advantages to manufacturing


W


hen it comes to moulding of plastic parts, OEMs have had to


choose from various technologies that are to a greater or lesser extent based on traditional injection moulding processes. Today, OEMs have a new and innovative technology to assess as they strive for a cost-effective, accurate, and efficient manufacturing technology. This new micro moulding process is based on the use of ultrasonics as the agent of polymer melting, and is designed specifically for manufacturers of small and precise plastic parts. With no need for a screw, barrel, and heater bands, the technology is extremely energy efficient and minimises waste. At the same time, as ultrasonics induce extremely low viscosity in melted materials, product designers can now innovate as they have never been able to before. Barcelona-based company Ultrasion spent a number of years researching and developing this brand new plastic moulding technology. Using a dosage system that delivers the correct quantity of standard pellets for every shot, the production cycle begins with the mould already closed and dosed with raw material at room temperature. The material is then contacted by an ultrasonic horn or “sonotrode” which is lowered, and as well as melting the material forces the polymer to flow into the mould cavities. The sonotrode then returns to its original position, and the cycle begins again. The ultrasound moulding technology is extremely precise, uses no heaters, and the process means that there is no material residence time, and therefore no material degradation. In addition, as the energy needed in the process is only at the point when the ultrasonic horn contacts the raw material to induce melt, it uses upwards of 90% less energy than a traditional micro injection technology. Material wastage, a problem in all sizes of injection moulding machines, is a massive issue in precision and micro moulding applications, where in some instances upwards of 99% of material processed will be scrapped. Where this material is expensive as is the case of some critical medical mouldings, this


22 SUMMER 2015 | MICROMATTERS


There are no materials that cannot be processed using this moulding technology, with successful moulding projects using everything from standard polypropylene to high density polyethylenes. The Sonorus 1G machine from the company — which has been designed specifically for precision and micro applications — can accommodate shot weights from 0.05g to 2.0g. In all materials, the reduced viscosity


becomes an even bigger problem. In the Ultrasion process, only the material required is dosed, and so runner and sprue wastage is all but eliminated.


ULTRASONIC MOULDING The nature of the ultrasonic moulding process is such that material melt characteristics are very different from those produced in injection moulding machines. The application of high intensity mechanical vibration that transmits energy directly into the polymer molecular structure results in an extremely fast and efficient melting process “inside out” rather than “outside in” which is how melting occurs in injection moulding via the electric heater bands. In addition, the new sprue concept in the Ultrasion technology means that it behaves as an energy director, orientating the waves in the flow direction meaning that molten material and waves travel together towards the mould cavities, which induces extremely low viscosity (almost as low as water) in the melted plastic.


Figure 1:


This new micro moulding process is based on the use of ultrasonics as the agent of polymer melting, and is designed specifically for manufacturers of small and precise plastic parts


allows for the attainment of especially long parts or parts with extremely thin walls. The machine can easily mould 15mm long parts with wall thicknesses of 0.075mm, and achievable tolerances are in the region of 0.01mm. The results achieved by some OEMs using


Figure 2:


Ultrasonic moulding was successfully used in the production of an eye retina surgery tip


this technology show the versatility of the machine and the precision achievable. One was for the manufacture of a cap with a filter for an ear protection device made from raw polyamide 12 (PA12), the ultrasonic moulding process successfully manufactured a part weighing 0.02g, with a 0.5mm wall thickness, and outside diameter of 4.4mm and an internal diameter of 2.9mm. Of enormous interest with this part was that the part — with a membrane overmoulding — was achieved in one operation. This proved impossible to achieve using a conventional micro injection moulding process, the alternative to Ultrasion’s ultrasonic moulding process being to mould the part using one process, and then to glue the membrane in a secondary process. The manufacturer reported a 300% increase in productivity using the Ultrasion technology. Finally, ultrasonic moulding was successfully used in the production of an eye retina surgery tip (see figure 2) made from raw polypropylene. The final part weighed 0.1g, had an internal diameter of 0.6mm with a 0.17mm wall thickness, and a wall thickness at the tip of 0.1mm. The tool for this application used two extremely small core pins sitting head to head, which would have broken using the high pressures of conventional micro injection moulding.


Ultrasion ultrasion.eu


http://ultrasion.eu/contact / MICROMATTERS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112