“CLIMBERS, LIKE SPACEMEN, WERE THIN ON THE GROUND IN BURNAGE.”
Cairngorms in 1971, and fearful that ‘certifi cation’ was undermining climbing’s ethos of risk and self-reliance, the BMC asked Sir John Hunt to take an overview. His report, published in 1975, warned that ‘by structuring safety conditions and codes,’ there was a danger that mountain training might ‘cramp initiative, to the detriment of safety.’ He proposed wide-ranging changes, including a constitution for the MLTB and oversight by the BMC.
Thus began one of the most intense and uncomfortable controversies in the history of British mountaineering. Jack Longland, fearful that his vision would be undone, simply ignored the BMC’s new constitution for the body he chaired and carried on as before. The BMC, responsible for administering an organisation it couldn’t control, suddenly lost a signifi cant proportion of its income, threatening bankruptcy. The fi ght spilled over into the corridors of Whitehall
and Westminster and the pages of the national press. It was only after a mediation process led by the Alpine Club, and some sensitive rebuilding work, that a solution was found.
Despite becoming absorbed in the mountain training world – he was appointed chief instructor at Plas y Brenin in 1958 and became director in 1960 – Jackson never lost his passion for mountain travel and exploration – nor the fundamental ethos of mountaineering. He also drew some of the leading climbers in Wales to come and work for him, including Don Roscoe and his future wife Barbara Spark, freshly returned from back to back all-female expeditions in the Himalaya. Barbara would go on to set up the outdoor education department at Bangor University, where Don went to work later on. This fl owering of outdoor education and mountain training, the growing number of local authority outdoor centres, the Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme, the teachers and scout leaders bringing young people into the mountains, made new demands and carried increased risks.
A series of accidents involving young people in the early 1960s gave impetus to calls for a recognised system of qualifi cations for mountain leaders; Longland, Langmuir and Jackson all joined a working group to this end in 1962. Its offspring was the Mountain Leader Training Board (MLTB), founded in 1964 by the BMC and the Central Council of Physical Recreation with Jack Longland as chair. Barbara Spark and Ray Greenall ran the fi rst Mountain Leader Course at Plas y Brenin that same year. There was just one award, the Mountain Leadership
Certifi cate, but the MLTB added further qualifi cations and its importance grew. The new structure gave mountain training a measure of infl uence within the sport that some climbers came to resent, a process that accelerated when Jack Longland became a deputy-chair of the new Sports Council in 1972. Although the BMC administered the scheme, it was the Sports Council that paid the bills. Alarmed at increasing numbers of noisy groups, shocked by the deaths of six young people in the
Re-heated arguments are rarely palatable, and it’s fair to say that the training debate of the 1970s has largely faded from memory. There is still an active discussion about the role of the outdoors in education, and how formal that process should get. But Mountain Training, the successor to the MLTB, isn’t where that argument happens anymore.
Ray Greenall Ran the fi rst
Mountain Leader Course at Plas y Brenin in 1964.
Alan Blackshaw
Perhaps best known for Mountaineering – from Hillwalking to Alpine Climbing, the successor to John Barford’s book, he was also president of the BMC, the Alpine Club and the UIAA.
Sir John Hunt Led the 1953
Everest expedition and published a
controversial report in 1975, proposing wide-ranging
changes, including a constitution for Mountain Training and oversight by the BMC.
Iain Peter Ex- chief executive
R A balancing act on Crib Goch.
of Plas y Brenin and instrumental in the creation of the fi rst UK-wide training board.
SUMMIT#73 | SPRING 2014 | 75
PHOTO: SUSAN JENSON.
PHOTO: ALEX MESSENGER.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100