RESPONSE 9/11 AND HAZMAT
Responders, some without respiratory protection equipment of any kind, stand atop a rubber pile.
RESPONSE Robert L. Domenici discusses lessons learned from Ground Zero T 16 CBNW 2013/02
he 9/11 attacks may seem like a long time ago to some, but the 2nd WMD-CST team was still relatively new then. During the 1990s, several Presidential Decision Directives (PDDs) defined the federal response to acts of terrorism involving
nuclear, biological, or chemical materials and weapons of mass destruction (NBC/WMD). Across the United States, special Army and Air National Guard units were trained to deter and detect NBC/WMD attacks – and to respond to them.
WMD-CST Units
The mission of each WMD-CST team is to support local and state authorities at domestic NBC incident sites. When my unit answered the call on 9/11, we learned that many of our civilian counterparts – trained and trusted individuals whom we had known for several years – were dead. As military men and women, we could not let the psychological impact of these losses impede our mission. When we arrived in Manhattan from our base in upstate New York, the 2nd WMD CST had to be ready. To support our civilian counterparts, my unit was responsible
for detecting and identifying WMD/NBC substances, assessing immediate and projected consequences, advising state and local authorities about response measures, and answering calls for additional military support. Our task was complicated by the
loss of communications equipment at the World Trade Center (WTC) itself. For a time, the Mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, could not be reached. A federal agency even asked us for communication assistance.
Training and equipment
Military training teaches soldiers to follow the chain of command, so the 2nd WMD CST identified who was next in-charge on the ground. Some of the civilian responders we teamed with hadn’t been adequately trained or equipped (at least for an event like this), and their commanders had not managed major incidents. Operationally, civilian authorities had to reconstitute their chain of command on-the-spot while continuing operations. Command and control (C2) faced more than just confusion and communication failure, however. Two other ‘Cs’ – cars and confined
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100