Editorial Editor
Adam Hewitt
adamh@cognitivepublishing.com editorial@railtechnologymagazine.com
Assistant Editor Kate Ashley
katea@cognitivepublishing.com Production
Art Director Rachel Ginty
advert@railtechnologymagazine.com Advertising
Advertising Sales Manager David Johnson
davidj@cognitivepublishing.com
Advertising Sales Executives Steve Delanty
steved@cognitivepublishing.com Patrick Bowley
patrickb@cognitivepublishing.com Neil Butcher
neilb@cognitivepublishing.com
Advertising Sales Executives Neil Butcher
neilb@cognitivepublishing.com Commercial
Business Development Manager Roy C. Rowlands
royc@cognitivepublishing.com
Circulation Manager Leanne Bennett
subscriptions@railtechnologymagazine.com
Accounts/Finance Heidi Rowlands
heidir@cognitivepublishing.com
Administration Danny Leatham
daniell@cognitivepublishing.com Holly Cooke
hollyc@cognitivepublishing.com Publisher
Roy V. Rowlands
royv@cognitivepublishing.com
© Copyright 2012 Cognitive Publishing Ltd. ISSN 1471-0668
The opinions and views expressed in the magazine are not necessarily those of the management or the publishers.
Give and take I
t’s summertime, which means terrible PR for the rail industry as we all go into paroxysms over the extent of fare rises.
The Government has confirmed that last year’s rise of ‘only’ RPI + 1% was a one-off, meaning this year’s will go back to the original plan of RPI + 3%, meaning the likely fare rise on regulated tickets come the new year will be around 6%.
Ministers say this is just a necessary step on a journey that will eventually see the end of inflation-busting fare rises, but unsurprisingly have not put a precise timeline on this.
They make a plausible case for the rises: shifting the burden from the taxpayer to the passenger on the one hand, and continuing investment on the other. The unions are having none of that, and argue loudly and repeatedly that much of the money is creamed off by private businesses, lawyers arguing about delay attribution, the rolling stock leasing structure, and so on. Bob Crow’s solution to the high cost of the industry, when asked by MPs? ‘Nationalise it. Nationalise it. Nationalise it.’
Cognitive Publishing Ltd
86 Deansgate, Manchester M3 2ER Tel: +44 (0)161 833 6320 Fax: +44 (0)161 832 0571
Email:
info@railtechnologymagazine.com www.railtechnologymagazine.com
The operators seem to be toying with letting the public know just how much control the state does still have, by launching a campaign against the proposed RPI +3% rise. An ATOC memo makes the point that this would put the TOCs on the same side as passengers, who would be reminded of the large role the DfT plays in fare rises. It would
send the message that they’re not just about profit-seeking, the TOCs think.
It could be a sensible bit of positioning, and the fact their thinking has become public will do them no harm, but whether actually launching such a campaign would be worth the damaged relationship with the DfT is questionable – especially as the TOCs seek the DfT’s help over franchising reform and want a lid kept on the ORR’s desired expansion to have more of a role in regulating the operators.
There will hopefully be more positive news for the public in the HLOS, also due this summer: the Government knows it will need to find money for a few headline- grabbing projects, though whether this will extend to, say, the entire
Northern Hub or Midland Main Line electrification, we don’t yet know. Ministers say they fully acknowledge the role rail infrastructure investment can have on economic growth and connectivity – plus, leaving the Northern Hub unfunded while going ahead with Crossrail, Reading, Thameslink and so on could send an unfortunate political message about prioritising the south east, which is already in pole position economically.
There are plenty of projects out there that make great sense both financially and in pure transport terms: let’s hope the Government digs deep and invests.
Adam Hewitt Editor
18 Building a bridge
RRUKA – linking universities and the industry.
30 Leading the way FirstGroup’s environmental success story.
54 Cutting train casualties Remotely monitoring Southeastern’s Networkers.
68 Finishing Blackfriars Three years of tackling engineering challenges.
rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 12 | 1
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92