Franchise Advice
on regardless, eventually recovering its loss (if any) and making a profit. In this situation, the first two questions I
am usually asked are:- 1. How does it affect my business? 2. Do I have to cease trading immediately or can I carry on trading?
To answer these questions, one has to
examine what it is that the franchisor owns vis à vis the franchisee’s business. The franchisor will claim ownership to
the intellectual property in the franchise. This will include the trade marks; logos; trade name; brand names; copyright in all literature (including the operations manual, advertising marketing promotional and point of sale material); trade secrets; the method of conducting the business; any know-how transferred by the franchisor to the franchisee and generally the goodwill associated with it.
and for all, therefore, to ensure that the franchisees continue to function; that they are operating their businesses successfully and paying the franchise fees. Another obligation of a liquidator is
to realise the best possible price for the assets in question. This means that he or she will be very keen to keep the franchise network alive because so long as it is alive it will have a value to the liquidator. In most cases the obligations of the franchisor are such that a liquidator will be able to perform them. However, a liquidator does have the right
“One of the primary obligations is to protect the assets. It is usually in the best interests of all, therefore, that the franchisees continue to function and that their businesses operate successfully”
All these will continue to exist
irrespective of what happens to the franchisor. These together with the franchise agreements will form a part of the assets of the franchisor’s business. The franchise agreement will not automatically come to an end unless there is an express provision in the franchise agreement for this. Assuming that the franchisor is a
credit or, indeed, a franchise outgrowing the owner and founder of the business. Despite this (infrequent, it must be stated) occurance, in most cases the franchisee will be able to pick up the pieces and carry
F
ranchisors, like any form of business operation, are not immune to difficulty and there are a number of reasons why a franchisor may not succeed – for instance, losing bank
limited liability company, and if going into administration is not an option, it will go into receivership or liquidation. In either case the liquidator or the receiver will take control of these assets but subject to the rights granted by the franchisor to the franchisee. One of the primary obligations of a
liquidator or a receiver is to protect the assets. In most cases, of course, the franchise agreements will be producing an income, previously for the franchisor and now for the liquidator. Usually, therefore, it is in the best interests of a liquidator,
to disclaim a franchise agreement on the basis that it creates onerous obligations. It would be rare indeed for a liquidator to do this because most franchise agreements do not impose unduly heavy obligations on the franchisor once the franchise is up and running. Although franchisors have numerous onerous obligations at the front end of the transaction (ie prior to the franchisee opening for business), once a franchisee has opened for business, the franchisor’s obligations are relatively easy to perform. Unless, of course, as was mentioned earlier, the franchise system is such that the franchisee is wholly or heavily dependent upon the franchisor’s continuing support. If the franchise involves a unique or special product that is manufactured by the franchisor, it may be that the manufacturing arm of the franchisor has brought down the franchisor’s business. If the primary object of a liquidator is
to gather in the franchisor’s assets and then to dispose of them for the best price obtainable, who, you may ask, would be interested in buying them? Obviously, someone in the same or a very similar line of business as the franchisor could be interested in buying the franchisor’s business as a going concern. In my experience most purchasers of failed franchisors insist on having at least one meeting with the franchisees to canvass views and gauge opinion to determine whether or not there could be a basis for a successful long-term relationship – so a business seemingly going under may not necessarily indicate the end of the line! n
Manzoor Ishani
Manzoor Ishani is a senior solicitor consultant with Sherrards (Solicitors), a commercial practice advising franchisors and franchisees in the UK and internationally. Phone: 01727 832 830 Email:
mgi@sherrards.com
June 2012 |
Businessfranchise.com | 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124