This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LONDON UNDERGROUND & OVERGROUND


M J Quinn explain more about their carbon reduction projects around the UK and on the Tube network. W


hen the Underground is crammed with commuters on a busy week-


day morning, few pay any attention to the lighting that surrounds them on their daily journey, let alone stop to consider its im- pact in the wider world – and who could blame them? Yet, lighting is one of the pennies that, if looked after, will help the pounds look after themselves.


For years, environmental campaigners have urged us to make use of public trans- port, and particularly rail, as a lower car- bon option – but the focus is usually on the trains rather than the stations. Far away from any ideological hype, there lies a real opportunity to reduce carbon emissions in stations, in addition to those reductions already being made on the rail and under- ground systems themselves, just as there is in any other industrial building.


Since adoption of the Climate Change Act in 2008 and with further changes to legis- lation likely in the future, many business- es across the UK are now taking steps to measure and reduce their carbon footprint and, in so doing, realising that potential savings can be measured in more ways than carbon alone.


M J Quinn are now working on various carbon reduction projects around the UK,


the latest project they have embarked upon being Leicester Square station, working for Tube Lines Ltd. Founded in Liverpool over 25 years ago and still privately owned, M J Quinn has seen phenomenal growth over the last few years and boasts a client list to be proud of. Having worked on London Un- derground for 25 years and with long-term relationships with London Underground Ltd, Transport for London, Network Rail and Tube Lines already in place, M J Quinn are in a great position to understand and adapt to the constantly evolving rail busi- ness and its place in our changing world.


The project at Leicester Square involves up- grading systems including lighting, heating and ventilation with lower carbon alterna- tives. For lighting, this means replacing the existing low-energy bulbs with LED lamps. In doing this, the fi rst saving to be made is in carbon. At Leicester Square, the total number of lamps in the public-facing areas is in the region of 5,000. By upgrading a large station like Leicester Square to LEDs, over 35,000 tonnes of carbon per year is saved by the lighting alone.


Once LEDs are installed, running costs are signifi cantly lower too, as the 55-watt lamps currently in use are replaced with 26-watt LEDs, drawing less than half the power and instantly cutting the electricity bill.


Maintenance costs are also reduced con- siderably, for several reasons. The life of an average LED is 7,000 hours: that’s 3,000 hours longer than a typical low-energy light bulb, so they don’t need to be replaced as often. Also, as LEDs degrade slowly rather than failing suddenly, maintenance is more easily managed, through the design of a suitable planned maintenance programme based on acceptable lux levels. This gradual rather than instant failure, which has occa- sionally closed stations, means expensive emergency call-outs due to lamp failures should be a thing of the past.


Beyond the immediate savings, planning for the future is also easier. Should regu- lations governing lux levels change, as is widely expected, LED lighting enables the use of control systems that allow lux levels to be varied without the need for a further full upgrade.


So, next time you’re wandering through Leicester Square, remember the 5,000 light bulbs and spare a thought for the per- son that had to change them…


FOR MORE INFORMATION Louise Webb, business development director T: 0207 239 378 W: www.mjquinn.co.uk


rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 11 | 75


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116