INTERVIEW: MARC DOYLE, CO-FOUNDER, METACRITIC The law of averages
Metacritic has become one of the most influential resources in games. Will Freeman and Stuart Richardson investigate the review aggregation website’s rise to power
FOUNDED in 2001 by siblings Marc Doyle and Julie Roberts with friend Jason Dietz, review aggregation site Metacritic had until recently remained on largely the same technology and design template. That alone is a testament to its creators’ forward thinking vision; almost a decade after inception, Metacritic in its original form is still relevant and contemporary. More than that, it has become a
keystone of the industry. Love it or loathe it, Metacritic scores are a hot topic not only for consumers, but PR departments, publishers, marketers, and even developers. Average review scores have long been a point of intense negotiation as publishers and studios ink deals, and Metacritic has become the recognised standard for that process. The website has changed the ecosystem of the industry at almost every level.
KNOWING THE SCORE “We were fortunate to have a strong vision of what we wanted to achieve right out of the gate,” says co-founder Doyle of Metacritic’s acceptance by the games industry. “By selecting the most respected critics in each industry, and by presenting their reviews and scores in an easy-to-digest format, based on a sound and consistent scoring system, we enabled our users to make the most of their
entertainment dollars by ‘consuming’ the highest quality movies, games, albums, or television shows.” As soon as 2003, the first of the big game publishers began publically endorsing ‘Metascores’ as a de facto gauge of quality, clearly recognising Metacritic as a reliable, robust platform.
“ 26 October 22nd 2010
developers use our Metascores as a measure of quality, to be considered alongside sales when assessing the ‘success’ of a game.”
I’ve always welcomed suggestions from publishers, which has been appreciated – even if they don’t always agree with our point of view.
Marc Doyle, Metacritic
Much of the website’s quality can be attributed to the fact that it isn’t automated, and that it constantly refreshes its list of relevant critics and publications. To a certain extent it holds not only the quality of developers to account, but also the work of the critics that ultimately make or break a game.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER That considered, Doyle is in a powerful position, but he is acutely aware of his responsibility. “I’ve always welcomed
suggestions from publishers, developers, and other creative people in the industry, and I have been personally available to these people to answer questions about our process, which has been appreciated, even if they don’t always agree with our point of view,” insists the co-founder. “I take my job
extremely seriously because I know many of these publishers and
Listening to feedback has lead to a constant refinement at Metacritic, which saw the site’s core technology completely revised in August. A new powerful backend means users can now browse a far more integrated database, looking at ‘career’ scores of publishers, writers, film directors and even record labels. If that notion is unsettling, fear not, as critics and publications can now also be monitored and compared.
HOT ON THE PRESS
Of course, the very media Metacritic monitors is in its own state of flux and, thanks to the website’s proximity to print and online publications, it is well positioned to look forward to the future of the relationship between games and the press.
“I can only hope that with the decline in the number and influence of traditional media outlets there will still be critics coming up in the tradition of Pauline Kael of The New Yorkeror Joe Morgenstern of The Wall Street Journal– critics who produce reviews which are viewed as works of art in and of themselves,” opines Doyle, who clearly adores the craft of criticism. “It is the quality of analysis which has always been the most important element of a review, and the ability of a critic to draw from prior works and from culture at large in analysing a new work truly makes his or her work important.” As its 10th anniversary nears Metacritic is developing, expanding its remit and evolving its concept. That is big news for the games
sector, because when Metacritic changes, the wider industry changes. As it absorbs and delivers more cross-referenced data from the business’ four corners, it looks set to become an even more important and influential resource.
www.metacritic.com
www.mcvuk.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120