search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
One unanticipated legacy of the Voting Rights Act and the creation of majority and minority districts has been the rise of the Republican Party in the South.


crat Gov. Jerry Brown in 1981, the “Burton Plan” had a profound impact. Democrats gained five House seats


and Republicans lost three. Looking at his map of the new dis-


trict lines, Burton chortled: “It’s my contribution to modern art.” Years later, House Speaker Nancy


Pelosi, the present holder of Burton’s San Francisco seat, told me: “We didn’t have many computers back then, so God gave us Phil’s brain.” Burton may be dead, but his map-


drawing skills are very much alive among Democrats — and Republi- cans. In Tennessee, the Republican supermajority in the state legislature developed a map for the nine U.S. House districts that — for the first time in Volunteer State history — divides Nashville into three Republican-lean- ing districts and eviscerated what had been a safely Democratic, Nashville- based district for Democrat Rep. Jim Cooper since 2003. “There’s no way, at least for me in


this election cycle,” said Cooper, who announced his retirement on Jan. 25 shortly after the new map was finalized. In Illinois, where Democrats have


a firm grip on both houses of the state legislature, the new district lines yielded 13 Democratic-leaning seats compared to three Republican- leaning seats, and only one truly com- petitive seat. The new map was a pivotal factor in the decision of Republican Rep. Adam


PLAYING POLITICS Despite the fact that House districts should not be drawn on the basis of race or ethnicity, New York Democrats have strengthened Rep. Jerry Nadler’s seat to connect his Jewish supporters in Brooklyn with those on the west side of Manhattan. Meanwhile a liberal area has been added to Rep. Nicole Malliotakis’ district, endangering the conservative freshman.


New York’s Democrat ‘Jerrymander’ H


Brooklyn.


Meanwhile, the neighboring GOP 11th District, anchored in Staten Island, will now sweep north to include liberal Park Slope, endangering freshman Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis. In 2020, Donald Trump won


this district by 11 points, while Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis beat incumbent Democrat Max Rose 53% to 47%. Rose is running this year to


retake his old seat, and the new progressive Park Slope voters could be enough to flip that margin.


The Chelsea News proclaimed the Nadler map a case of ‘Jerrymandering,’ rifing on the congressman’s first name. The Journal said the map


was drawn with partisan malice aforethought. New York is losing a House seat, so it will have 26 districts next year. Today Republicans hold eight. Under the lines Democrats are


proposing, the GOP would have the advantage in only four seats, or 15%. New York is a blue state, but not that blue: Trump won 38% of the vote in 2020.


MAY 2022 | NEWSMAX 41


ere’s the snake-shaped district map that was drawn up by the Democratic- controlled state legislature in New York for veteran Democrat Rep. Jerrold


Nadler (pictured above). Your first instinct might be to grab the cartographer and do a field sobriety test,


observed The Wall Street Journal. The new district will connect Nadler’s Jewish supporters in Manhattan and


AP IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100