search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REMOTE COLOUR GRADING Remote colour grading has always been a difficult technical challenge because of the large bandwidth required to leverage ‘critical review’ quality video throughout the workflow process. As a consequence, most of the industry has deployed creatives at home with remote access to Blackmagic Design’s DaVinci Resolve or FilmLight’s Baselight products. Typically, there is some content that has been synchronised to the workstation at home, allowing creatives to see changes that they deploy in real-time on the monitors in front of them. While these machines are typically connected via VPN back to the office (where the synchronisation occurs), local content in the home does need to be protected. A professional-grade firewall is highly recommended to segregate the home environment from the creative environment – and protect content from cyber criminals. Bandwidth is a bigger challenge. The most common workflow for real-time collaboration is to connect a ClearView Flexbox to the colourist workstation at the office, allowing high quality reviews to be pushed to other viewers. For example, Santa Monica facility Arsenal FX regularly enabled remote collaboration by connecting screening rooms at client offices with the colourist driving the session. When quarantine came into force, Arsenal FX issued colour kits for critical review including a Sony 24-inch OLED, an Apple TV loaded with the ClearView Flex App. “We enabled the client to view a colour calibrated image with no delay and fantastic picture fidelity,” says Josh Baca, Conform Artist, Technologist and Partner. “The ability to use an iPad or laptop to


connect everyone remotely to the same stream using ClearView Flex was invaluable.” The team are also


performing VFX editorial, QC, title sessions and other finishing workflows. “Anything a client would normally come into our studio for we are able to accommodate over ClearView Flex,” says Baca. Some colourists must work in J2K, or need 4:4:4 colour chroma, or the highest possible quality that their bandwidth will allow. As a result, Sohonet has also launched an option for colourists WFH that supports higher quality critical reviews. In this setup, the colour workstation at the office is connected to a ClearView Pivot unit, which streams a compressed version to a Pivot Lite unit in the home. While 2K workflows can be conducted at extremely high quality (4:4:4 12-bit) and 4K workflows can also be conducted at critical review output (4:2:2 10-bit), the bandwidth required to facilitate this workflow is 100- 200 Mbps down to the home. If the schedule doesn’t permit, or the home bandwidth is insufficient to conduct a real-time ‘over-the-shoulder’ session via ClearView Flex or ClearView Pivot Lite, then a strong alternative is the Moxion Cuts workflow. The final ‘cut’ of the feature or episode can be uploaded into the Moxion platform and streamed (with buffering) to an Apple TV or iPad Pro, allowing for the review to take place remotely. Coming soon is the ability to remotely control the playback of the Moxion Cuts session, to allow the presenter (likely the colourist) to pause and play the content while others are viewing. This enables a scene-by-scene review, with appropriate pauses for discussion and note taking.


REMOTE FINISHING & SCREENING Previously, when the final version of the feature or episodic had finally come together, the key parties would gather in a darkened screening room. This would typically include the director, cinematographer, post and visual effects supervisors, colourist, editor, executive producers and other creative executives from the distribution studio. They would review the content, pausing to give notes, comments and directives. But even the largest of studio theatres can only support a handful of viewers with appropriate social distancing. With new best practice concepts, where teams of creatives never come in physical contact with each other to prevent wholescale team infection, we have to design a new way to review together while being physically separate. Taking advantage of ClearView Pivot’s one-to-many real-time streaming architecture, your post production supervisor can work with the studio post team to establish a multiple screening room approach. In this scenario, two or three different teams of creatives can watch the content from separate screening rooms across campus, around town or even in different countries. The editor can play and pause the content at will, with every screening room seeing exactly the same frame at the same time. Firing up your preferred conferencing tool allows everyone to comment when the content is paused but move quickly back to professional immersion once playback is resumed.


Contact sales@sohonet.com to discuss your specific requirements


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148