search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS Hundreds of UK tower blocks ‘at risk of collapse’


BLOCKS CONSTRUCTED with the large panel system (LPS) method have a ‘systemic structural flaw’, making them vulnerable to risk of collapse, housing experts report. The Independent reported on


the views of fire and construction experts Sam Webb and Arnold Tarling, who have urged the government to investigate the issue, which they believe is ‘bigger […] than Grenfell’ because the defects identified would cover around 41,000 flats, home to around 100,000 people. The LPS method was used to build towers in the 1960s and 1970s, with cracks in some flats ‘wide enough to allow residents to slide their hands inbetween the walls’. This also leaves the towers ‘at risk of complete collapse in the event of a fire or gas explosion’, such as happened at Ronan Point in the 1960s, with these defects discovered at the blocks in Leicester, Rugby, Portsmouth and two estates in London. As a consequence, hundreds of council tenants and leaseholders are ‘in the process of being moved for their own safety’, with documents seen by the news outlet showing at least 575 such blocks still standing across the UK. As a result, the hazards are ‘likely


to be even more widespread’, and campaign and research group Tower Blocks UK is calling for the government to set up a nationwide fire safety audit and inspect all UK LPS tower blocks. Mr Webb, co founder of the group, stated: ‘This is an even bigger issue than Grenfell because more tower blocks are affected by these structural problems than by cladding problems. The government needs to take responsibility for this as a matter of urgency.’ The group is asking for either the


Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) or the Building Research Establishment (BRE) to inspect the buildings. Its representative Frances Clark added: ‘The government needs to carry out a safety audit to identify


6


al l the large panel system tower blocks, and make sure qualified experts check whether or not these blocks are safe. We have to face up to this because residents can’t be left at risk, living in potentially unsafe buildings.’ Mr Tarling believes‘fundamental’


structural flaws bringing the risk of collapse remain in all such blocks. He added: ‘It’s like a house of


cards. The cards were stacked up and held together by a bit of simple bracing work. It’s not just the risk of gas explosion like Ronan Point. A serious enough fire in an LPS building could result in collapse. The floor slabs would expand and push out the external wall panels and things would break up quite quickly. Strengthening work isn’t viable with these blocks. The flaws are so fundamental.’ Independent housing


researcher Hannah Brack gathered the evidence showing that 575 blocks were built using LPS methods, and she said: ‘This is a major national problem. There could be at least 100,000 residents living in blocks built using LPS construction methods and potentially at risk. The government needs to help local authorities come up with a plan to deal with it. These were flats built using the very shoddiest of methods. Councils just don’t know exactly what they have on their hands and what to do with them now.’


DECEMBER 2018/JANUARY 2019 www.frmjournal.com


Both she and Mr Tarling have


been told by several councils that they ‘no longer hold a complete record of building work’ at LPS blocks, so it ‘isn’t clear which towers have undergone repairs in an effort to strengthen them’. Mr Tarling noted that this was ‘a mess’, adding that ‘the government needs to find out where the blocks are, what state they are in, and start facing up to the problem. You can’t leave residents in potential danger’. An MHCLG spokeswoman said that it had held its first meeting recently to discuss the LPS issue, adding that ‘building owners are responsible for checking their properties and we have given councils and housing associations advice on checking the structural safety of buildings which use large panel systems’. According to the Local


Government Association (LGA), the meeting had taken place but it ‘could not say’ how many council representatives attended, and a spokesman added: ‘The issues that building owners face with LPS buildings are complex and technical ones. They require expert advice on what to do and the LGA is not placed to do that. We have therefore been pushing the government to provide that advice.’


No Ledbury demolition However, Southwark Council has confirmed that the Ledbury Estate’s


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60