search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Modelling applications


has advantages over other models for the immediate response to an incident, including that the risk area is not based on the expected form of the distribution of material. This system simply calculates how far


material might spread, so it is effectively a fail safe estimate, and will predict a larger area than other models. Since data from a well installed quality instrument may be valid over a sizeable area, a single Plumecast system could provide fast information on incidents away from the host site. In addition, the actual calculated location of a plume can be calculated, and this is based on the actual measured wind variations. Again, there is a fail safe approach, and Plumecast assumes that once an area is contaminated, then it stays contaminated. A major benefit of this approach is that the area marked is automatically updated as conditions vary.


Plumecast is also a more resilient system, as it does not require communications with external authorities and allows regional services to respond, even if those authorities are unavailable or overwhelmed by multiple events (see Figure 6 on previous page). In summary, early knowledge of the area at


risk from smoke or airborne hazardous material is important in reducing casualties and disruption during a major fire incident. This knowledge is dependent on wind information, and sources of wind data vary, as does their quality. Key risk sites could make a difference by installing quality wind


instruments, but there is little pressure to do so, and no defined standards for the equipment. Computer models can predict risk areas and


produce the results in an easily understood form, but take time. Modern technology now allows effectively instantaneous provision of information on risk areas to help minimise casualties from smoke or toxic plumes


Michael Brettle is a chartered meteorologist. For more information, view page 5


FOCUS


www.frmjournal.com DECEMBER 2018/JANUARY 2019


21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60