Fines and prosecutions Landlords fined for multiple flats’ fire safety breaches

CROYDON COUNCIL has fined two private property companies responsible for more than 30 unlicensed flats in one building in the London borough, after serious fire safety breaches were found. Croydon Advertiser reported

on the prosecutions of the two businesses after London Fire Brigade (LFB) alerted Croydon Council about ‘serious’ fire safety breaches in ‘as many as’ 36 flats in the former NatWest building on Sydenham Road. Among those identified were a locked fire escape, ‘poor’ ventilation and defective fire doors, which meant that there was ‘serious harm or potential harm’ posed to tenants. In turn, LFB described the breaches as rating ‘10 out of 10’ in terms of their seriousness. Further to this, it was established that the flats were not licensed by the council under its landlord licensing scheme, and while all of the fire safety issues have been resolved since LFB visited in 2017, it was also noted that one of the flat's tenants ‘did not know the building’s fire evacuation procedures’, which would have been a ‘condition if the property was licensed’. This property became the focal

point for the licensing investigation, which later led to building owner

AA Homes and Housing and Anabow Services having to submit all 36 ‘fully correct and paid-for’ landlord licence applications. This took them until March 2018 to do for the five storey block, and the two private companies were taken to court by the council. At court, first tier tribunal

property chamber judge Sonya O’Sullivan stated: ‘There were serious fire safety issues in the property and accordingly there was serious harm or potential harm to the tenants in failure to license. We agree that there had been a wholesale failure to license as many as 36 flats out of a total 52 [which] is a relevant factor to be weighed against the Applicants.’

She fined them a combined

total of £32,000, but agreed to reduce the fine by £6,000 after both companies appealed. Alison Butler, deputy leader

and cabinet member for homes and Gateway services, said: ‘Private landlords have a duty to keep all their tenants safe, and the council’s landlord licensing scheme makes sure they do. ‘This landlord knew they

had to license all their rented properties but failed to meet this responsibility until council officers took action. Most Croydon landlords do the right thing, and this case shows that any landlord who does flout the rules risks a hefty fine.’

Cardiff landlord guilty of ‘horrifying’ safety failings In addition, both the front and

ALVIN GEORGE Chisholm was prosecuted following an investigation by Cardiff Council, which found issues including breaches of fire safety. Wales Online reported on the

prosecution of Mr Chisholm, after a tenant at his property contacted the council about its condition and an officer visited to inspect it soon afterwards. The report stated that the ‘horrifying’ findings included an unmaintained and defective fire alarm; no fire protection for the gas and electricity meters; no fire escapes; an ‘unsafe’ kitchen; unmaintained waste water pipes and heating; and the fact access was available to an unsafe flat roof.

back garden of the two storey property, which was divided into two flats, were filled with rubbish and builders’ waste. At Cardiff Magistrates Court, he pleaded guilty to 12 charges relating to houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) management and licensing regulations, having initially pleaded not guilty in September. At sentencing, he was given a fine of £5,000. Lynda Thorne, who is cabinet

member for housing and the council’s communities councillor, stated: ‘This case is a clear example of a landlord renting out a property in a state which is completely unacceptable. The pictures of the


property speak for themselves. I would like to make it clear to all the landlords that think they can rent out sub-standard properties that they need to think again. ‘If these matters are reported to

us, then we will investigate and then take necessary action in the best interests of the tenants.’ After the case, Mr Chisholm told

Wales Online that the property had been managed for several years by a housing association, but that he was still the owner of the property. He maintained that he was a ‘good landlord’, and noted that all the issues raised had ‘been resolved’

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60