search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVERTORIAL


ANALYSE THIS


Larry Rumbol looks at the importance of fuel analysis and how it will ensure your yacht operates at its peak performance levels, no matter where it is cruising


F


or over 47 years, Spectro | Jet-Care have been providing a dedicated and comprehensive analysis service to the aviation, marine and industrial markets around the world.


Fuel Faith


There are a few things in life that cost an appreciable amount that we never get to see or touch. Insurance is one but a far more tactile thing is fuel. In our cars we hear it go into the tank and probably smell it and occasionally get a vestige of it on our hands. It is the same with superyacht bunkering. Just like cars we blindly (trustingly) have faith that the golden liquid is what it says on the (bunker) delivery note. With cars it is indeed a rare occasion – front page news even, that the fuel was off spec. For yachts, this is sadly not that uncommon. In fact, off-spec or contaminated fuel is not totally the woe of superyachts as heavy fuel for large commercial vessels is also not uncommonly off-spec.


If only it were that easy…


If we go back three years there was a step change in the fuel sulphur limit for all shipping as of January 1st 2020. This is commonly known as IMO 2020 Sulphur Regs. Sulphur being limited as of that date to 0.1% (1000ppm). Pre-2012 heavy fuel had a 4.5% global limit. Heavy fuel (HFO) at that time was a residual fuel, almost what was left in a barrel of crude oil after all the other distillates were refined.


The mindset of offloading suspect fuel is a throwback to the earlier times of poor quality residual heavy fuel. The spec was loose, it was black, the consistency of set honey and it was just plain residual and engines just burned it, period. Such were the mechanical consequences of off-spec fuel that a legal profession evolved – namely Bunker Claim lawyers. There is even a well


supported bunker industry association (IBIA) whose very ‘raison d’etre’ is fuel quality, supply and marketing the same.


Superyacht fuel, a special case but why?


Many superyachts, by their very nature, journey to new locations and new horizons and consequently need to bunker fuel but in much smaller quantities than commercial vessels. Often this is by road tanker or barge and if the location is new, and the yacht unknown – there is the potential opportunity for off-spec or contaminated fuel to be delivered along with the correct spec fuel. It may not even be intentional, it may just be poor housekeeping in a faraway and remote location. Think about what one actually does with off-spec or contaminated fuel and one can foresee the eagerness to dispose of it.


Not all yachts are of a size where fuel can be isolated before use and the speed of their lab report is ever more important. Others can, however, quarantine until the lab report returns. Commercial ships fill collapsible 5 litre containers (cubetainers) with a sample and these are kept on board in accordance with strict IMO rules. Few superyachts have the spare space for this and all are not subject to commercial rules. Realising this, Spectro designed a bespoke superyacht fuel sampling and testing system. It is known as the Fuel Verification Kit.


The power of three


The Fuel Verification Kit comprises of three 500ml fuel sample bottles each with a tamper proof and unique numbered tag. When the


supplier arrives at quay or shipside they are made aware that these tamper proof samples will be taken. It is suggested that the process is photographed as well as the tag numbers recorded and shared. In itself this very process can prevent off-spec fuel being knowingly delivered as the proof of where it came from is unequivocal.


One of the three bottles is sent to the Spectro Lab (analysis pre-paid with the kit), the other two remain on board. Should lab analysis prove the fuel off-spec or contaminated with bacteria there are two remaining verified samples on board. One can be sent to the supplier’s lab of choice and the remaining one stays on board should litigation require further testing.


There is another advantage to these three bottles. Superyachts visit spectacular locations rightly protected by environmental regulations. Eager Port Authorities may request sight of bunker delivery notes and take an interest in the ‘actual’ fuel Sulphur level. It has been known for some to take a sample and request the yacht to await the result. Having a proven verified sample on board with a lab report shows true due diligence in fuel husbandry and experience shows that authorities respect such care and are happy to accept this evidence.


Spectro | Jet-Care have three state of the art international laboratories and are considered the go-to lab for superyacht fuel, oil, hydraulic and fluid analysis.


For more details visit www.spectro-oil.com


ONBOARD | SUMMER 2023 | 145


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176