STATESIDE Stateside
Sharon Harris looks at the apparently problematic issue of sports betting in North America
C
Wait…isn’t that the whole point the AGA has pushed for several years, asserting that federally-
legalized sports betting would ensure integrity of the bets and virtually eliminate a black market?
8 MARCH 2018
ongratulations to my hometown Philadelphia Eagles for winning this year’s Super Bowl. Weeks later, it still feels wonderful to say goodbye to decades of championship drought. Plus,
it is a really sweet feeling to know they overcame many challenges this season to defeat the National Football League’s top dogs – the New England Patriots and Tom Brady. The American Gaming Association (AGA) has a
different perspective on that day, analyzing the gambling numbers. Prior to the game on February 4th, the AGA predicted that Americans would illegally bet more than $4.6 billion – or 97 per cent of all wagers. The three per cent of legal wagers in Nevada was projected at $138.5 million. Casinos probably paid out big time to those who bet on the Eagles. With any luck, this will be the final year for the thriving black market gambling rings. The US Supreme Court must render its decision about legalizing sports betting nationwide no later than when the current session ends in June. While many states have established some guidelines to be ready, the AGA has recently condemned some new self-serving provisions that Major League Baseball (MLB), the National Basketball Association (NBA) and even some legislators are pushing. Despite no final decision yet, the MLB and NBA
are already exploring ways to profit from the operators’ program. For example, an Indiana state representative, working with the MLB’s sports betting lobby, has refined his proposed legislation. The new language mandates that sports betting operators will pay sports leagues 20 per cent prior to paying state taxes. The leagues have their game plan in mind, but clearly the legislators have no clue about doing business profitably. What will remain to make the effort worth it?
Little, claims American Gaming Association (AGA) President and CEO Geoff Freeman. He released a statement, saying “While we applaud Representative Morrison’s efforts to bring legal, transparent sports betting to Indiana, handing sports leagues 20 per cent of the net, after winnings are paid out, undercuts its economic viability.” My dad had two economic philosophies for our
amusement company. He used to say “we are not in this for a hobby” and “to do business without profit is not doing business at all.” He was right. Why even bother? Now, the MLB and NBA have moved on to Missouri
as another possible test market and have drafted legislation with even more questionable provisions. Why there? Although the NBA has led the lobbying efforts so far, Missouri is home to two major MLB franchises, the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals. Missouri already has two potential bills in place and this would be a third option. The MLB seeks to introduce a one percent
“integrity fee,” or more simply, levy a tax on all Missouri wagers that the league would receive. It is an alternate formula that ensures the MLB receives roughly the same money as in Indiana. The kicker is that the obligation to ensure integrity would still fall on the operators. So, what “integrity” would they enjoy from the leagues for the fee? Almost nothing. Wait…isn’t that the whole point the AGA has pushed for several years, asserting that federally- legalized sports betting would ensure integrity of the bets and virtually eliminate a black market? If a league has a powerful say, each will advocate for its own best interests instead of what is good for the overall general public. The proposed legislation lists several other
onerous provisions, but these are my favorites. Operators must bar various people from betting, but the leagues would not supply operators with adequate information for enforcement. This would
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74
