PHAM NEWS | APRIL 2024 16 Pointof View


Getting apprentices on the right course


How much do you know about the current plumbing and heating apprenticeship routes? If you’re an employer, is there a better pathway that will ensure that apprentices are skilled in the areas you need them to be? Tracey Richardson, from EAS Mechanical Ltd, argues it’s time for a re-think.


M


any of us will be aware that the current Plumbing and Domestic


Heating Technician standards (apprenticeship) have recently been reviewed and approved with some new changes coming about, such as the introduction of the ‘non-domestic’ route, which itself is a bit of a contradiction in the fact that we have ‘domestic’ as part of the main title. As an apprenticeship


company, we have had to turn several companies away, due to the fact their proposed apprentices won’t be able to achieve the criteria for the current standard as they don’t undertake some of the work required to cover the scope. Some can outsource their apprentices to other companies to cover this issue, but not all. We always send the companies


a skills scan that shows the range of expected tasks they would need to cover to ensure their apprentices could fulfi l the requirements of the standards. We do this for two reasons: fi rstly, if we didn’t, we would be setting apprentices up for failure and, secondly, we would be letting the employers down by not alerting them to the fact that their apprentices aren’t going to pass. It also safeguards us, by keeping the employers fully informed of such actions. Then there is the other side,


where we have companies who do undertake gas, but the current standard only covers the basic CCN 1 and CENWAT, but these companies also want their apprentices to have a fuller scope of appliances such as cookers, fi res, etc.


Right option How much do employers in the industry really understand about the current standards to help them identify the correct course to put their apprentices on? We have had some apprentices


that have started on the current standards, gas option, but during their training the sites they work on have turned to greener alternatives to fossil fuels, eff ectively overlooking the


Tracey Richardson Lead IQA/assessor and tutor at EAS Mechanical Ltd


apprentice’s gas option. Many would suggest that they


simply switch their course to the environmental route, but apart from the fact the learner is often too far down the path to make that practical, the funding would not be there to facilitate this extra training required to make the switch, plus some training centres do not always off er the alternatives anyway.


I suggest a Level 3 core plumbing, heating and sanitation


standard, which practically


everyone in our industry who deals with the ‘wet’ side of our industry can enrol their apprentices


So, what is the solution? Last year I asked CIPHE and PHAM News to run a survey, to see whether employers felt the current apprenticeships were suitable for their companies’ range of work. What came out of the results showed that around a third of the industry is being let down by current off erings. So, as a result, I suggest what some might think is a bit of a radical shake up for our industry training – a Level 3 core plumbing, heating and sanitation standard, which practically everyone in our industry who deals with the ‘wet’ side can enrol their apprentices on. This is proposed to take place over 30 to 36 months, which in eff ect encompasses everything on the ‘wet’ side within the current standard, but potentially with more emphasis on relevant appliances and elements such as Heat Interface Units and Legionella control. But what about those who


still want the gas side of the qualifi cation? Their apprentices can be enrolled on a gas engineering diploma, which lasts from around 18 months. Either of these courses could be started fi rst, to give the employers some degree of control as to what they would like their apprentices to do. Personally, I would suggest for the majority that doing the plumbing course fi rst is a better option, as the minimum age for someone coming into our industry is 16, so I’m not sure how many customers would feel safe with someone so young and not much industry experience doing gas work in their house. The current gas standard


gives better scope to also train up on more appliances as part of the standard, so the apprentices would emerge from


the course having a better span of knowledge and competencies on appliances they could work on straight away.


Blurred lines So, that also leads on to the ‘blurred lines’, with the qualifi cations available. The current plumbing and domestic heating course covers the wet side of the heating, in other words, the heat emitters, underfl oor heating and associated components; something which was the case, even on the old Level 2 course. But what about the gas engineer? It does exactly what it states on the tin, it teaches the apprentice all the elements of the gas side of fi tting, maintaining and fault- fi nding boilers and other gas appliances, but not necessarily delving into the wet side of the heating systems, unless chosen as an elective unit. It is little wonder that the


companies behind the creation of the Low Carbon Heating Technician found a way of by-passing the environmental route that is currently one of the pathways on the plumbing and domestic heating standard. It will still need to introduce a substantial amount of plumbing and heating, which will need to adhere to current legislation, but is aimed at producing a more rounded qualifi cation better suited to their industry because it is being designed by employers in that fi eld, including MCS. It is also classed as one of a few


‘Royal apprenticeships’, which are ‘green apprenticeships’ which have been hand-picked by industry experts to celebrate the Coronation of His Majesty King Charles III. That course is proposed to be completed in 36 months, including the training on heat pumps and the like, so again, will take a year from the current environmental route option on the current standard. When I have asked the trade


organisations, who guide the ‘employer group’, as to why there isn’t an option for just core only, to enable companies that only want to do bathrooms, etc., their response is that ‘it’s what the employers want and there are courses for those who just want to do bathroom/kitchen


fi tting,’ i.e. the new Fitted Interiors Installers standard. However, when you inspect the


occupational standards for this qualifi cation, it states, ‘Fitted Interiors Installers work as part of a wider installation team to include other trade professionals such as electricians, plumbers and general builders’. So, it would seem this doesn’t satisfy the needs of employers that only want to take that direction. Even the Knowledge, Skills and Behaviours that must be met for this standard state: K13: The basic principles of


plumbing: tools, water and waste fi ttings, water and waste pipe types, isolating water supply and limits of competence. K14: The basic principles


of electrical installation, plug and lighting circuits and ring circuits, fi tting fascias, consumer unit, isolating electrical supply and limits of competence.


Held back Why are the trade organisations and the ‘employer group’ so keen on holding plumbing back as an industry, when in reality it is a rapidly changing environment? Is it really what ‘the employers want’? I have a list of employers that


would contradict that point, who are eager to see a core only option to be available – one in particular is a very large and well-respected company that employs around 2,000 people but have said they don’t employ plumbers as they don’t have gas in their business. They further said they have tried getting some of their team onto local plumbing courses for site kitchen and temporary site toilets plumbing, but are never able to get them on a Level 2 or 3 course. We haven’t scratched the surface with asking all colleges to gather and release their data. I would be interested to


hear other people’s views on this matter, to see exactly what they think of the current plumbing apprenticeship – whether they think it is fi t for purpose, or whether they fi nd it too restricting for any future apprentices they would like to take on. ◼ phamnews.co.uk/424/20


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48