MSPs


“A supply chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and in practice, that weak link is usually inconsistency.”


build enterprise-grade security in-house, MSPs can provide access to the same expertise, tooling, and incident response capabilities that their larger peers rely on. But while the case for MSPs is strong, the risk of over-reliance is equally real. Without proper oversight, transparency, and contractual clarity, the very partnerships designed to close security gaps can end up opening new ones. Te challenge for leaders, then, is not whether to use MSPs - that decision is already being made across industries - but how to integrate them strategically into the governance of supply chain security.


Why MSPs are now more ‘partner’ than ‘provider’ In most organisations, the security team is already running at full stretch just trying to defend the perimeter. Expecting them to also map, monitor, and manage a sprawling web of third- and fourth- party dependencies is like throwing in some hurdles, pits, and a long jump at the end. It simply isn’t feasible. Tat’s why MSPs have had to evolve from peripheral providers to core partners. Teir value lies in reach and continuity: the ability to watch for threats that emerge at any point in the supply chain, not just within the walls of the enterprise. With 24/7 monitoring, dedicated threat intelligence, and scalable resources, MSPs can provide the kind of persistent vigilance that individual organisations would struggle to maintain on their own. Just as important, MSPs bring consistency to an ecosystem that


is anything but consistent. Every vendor, platform, and integration has its own security baseline, which means a business relying on dozens of suppliers is, in practice, inheriting dozens of different risk postures. By applying standardised controls and compliance frameworks, MSPs can smooth out those variations, reducing the weak spots that attackers so oſten exploit. It’s a technical win for boards, but it’s also a governance win. It translates a fragmented,


www.pcr-online.biz


opaque landscape into something measurable, reportable, and, most importantly, defensible in the face of tightening regulations. MSPs might not have the power to eliminate the complexity of modern supply chains, but they do help ensure that complexity doesn’t automatically equal vulnerability.


A marker in the sand A supply chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and in practice, that weak link is usually inconsistency. One vendor may follow strict patching cycles and compliance frameworks, while another cuts corners on updates or lacks visibility into its own subcontractors. Multiply that inconsistency across dozens or even hundreds of suppliers, and the result is a patchwork of exposures that no single organisation can realistically untangle. Tis is where MSPs add their magic. By introducing common baselines for monitoring, reporting, and compliance, they impose a degree of standardisation that individual organisations struggle to enforce on their own. Te end result, when done well, is to bring discipline to a security ecosystem that is otherwise fractured and unpredictable. Just as importantly, MSPs give enterprises the ability to respond


faster when disruptions inevitably occur. A breach in a single supplier’s system can ripple outward with alarming speed, but MSP- led response frameworks can contain incidents before they escalate into wider crises. Tey also reduce duplication of effort; rather than every company in a supply chain reinventing its own protocols, MSPs can apply tested frameworks consistently across multiple tiers. For those with a seat at the boardroom table, this consistency


serves to extend visibility and resilience into places they cannot directly reach or influence. Put simply, MSPs act as force multipliers – a marker in the sand that amplifies security, response and continuity across the entire network.


November/December 2025 | 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52