Security
crucial question is which weaknesses create meaningful exposure in the customer’s own environment. Tat means looking beyond the sheer number of vulnerabilities
and focusing instead on exploitability, business criticality and how an attacker might move through connected systems. A vulnerability on a highly exposed or business-critical asset is not the same as one on a low- impact system deep inside the estate. Tis is where partners can add immediate value. Customers need
help turning technical data into operational priorities. Tey need a clearer picture of what needs to be addressed now, what can wait and how to reduce risk without overwhelming already stretched teams. Tat opens the door to more strategic services around assessment, remediation planning and ongoing exposure management.
2. Build stronger protection for the gap between discovery and remediation Even mature organisations cannot close every gap at speed. Some patches take time to test, and many systems cannot tolerate immediate change. In some cases, a fix may not yet be available. As the window between discovery and exploitation shrinks, that delay
becomes more significant. Te discussion should therefore also include the protections that sit around patching, particularly while remediation is under way. Customers need compensating controls that reduce risk during this period. One example is virtual patching. Where a fix is not yet available,
cannot be deployed quickly or requires further testing, organisations can block known exploit paths at the network layer using IPS and WAF signatures, behavioural protections and protocol anomaly detection. Tis helps reduce exposure during the period between vulnerability discovery and full remediation. Tis goes beyond technology and is an architectural and
operational question. Partners that can help customers design layered protection around
real-world constraints will be well placed to deepen relationships and move into more consultative territory.
3. Treat ‘unpatchable’ assets as a strategic security challenge One of the most important realities in cybersecurity is that not every asset can be modernised quickly, or at all. Legacy infrastructure, operational technology, embedded systems and specialist industry devices oſten remain in place for years. Tat becomes a much bigger issue when threat discovery accelerates,
as we’re seeing now with the arrival of foundational AI models. Weaknesses that may once have gone unnoticed or received little attention can become much easier to uncover and act upon for customers; that turns long-standing technical debt into a more urgent business risk. In this context, partners have a real opportunity to lead more strategic
conversations. Segmentation, stricter access control, monitoring and governance all become more important in environments where patching is slow, limited or impossible.
4. Reduce exposure by questioning what really needs to be reachable As AI makes scanning, analysis and exploitation more efficient,
www.pcr-online.biz
reachable systems become more attractive as targets. Public-facing services, exposed administrative interfaces and overly broad access pathways all increase the opportunity for compromise. Identity has a critical role to play here too, because weak or overly permissive access controls can make it far easier for attackers to move through the environment once an initial foothold has been gained. Tat is why attack surface reduction needs renewed focus. Customers
should be asking tougher questions about which services truly need to be exposed, which users need access to what, and whether older remote access assumptions still make sense. Identity protection and Zero Trust access should be central to that discussion, helping organisations tighten authentication, limit unnecessary privilege and reduce the number of pathways attackers can exploit. Tis creates another important opportunity for partners. Many
customers are already reviewing access models, identity controls, Zero Trust strategies and internet-facing risks, but oſten in a piecemeal way. Partners can help connect those strands into a more coherent programme that links security improvement to operational resilience. Tat’s a valuable conversation because it sits above product features and gets closer to business outcomes.
5. Prepare for machine-speed defence, not human- speed response As foundational models increase the speed and scale of offensive activity, human-only response models come under greater strain. Security teams will still need people at the centre of judgment and accountability, but they will also need far better automation, visibility and orchestration around them. Tat does not mean customers should race towards autonomy
for its own sake. In fact, many will be cautious, and rightly so. What they do need is a clearer route to faster detection, faster triage and faster containment, supported by reliable asset visibility and better operational workflows. Te commercial value for partners will lie in helping customers modernise the operating model around security.
A bigger role for the channel Te wider significance of this shiſt is that trust is becoming more important than ever. Customers are being told that AI will transform every part of cybersecurity, but many are unsure how to separate genuine progress from noise. Tey are also conscious that every new capability brings new risk. Tat is why the partner role is changing. Customers need advisors
who can explain where the pressure points are and how to respond in a way that is both commercially sensible and technically credible. Tey need partners who can help them prioritise investment, phase adoption and build confidence with leadership teams. Te rise of more powerful foundational models should therefore be
seen as more than just a threat story. Rather, it is a moment that will test which partners can move beyond transactional conversations and into more strategic relationships. Te channel opportunity lies in helping customers adapt to a threat
landscape that is moving faster than many of their existing assumptions. It’s incumbent on partners, distributors and vendors to ensure
partners have the combination of technical understanding and business judgement needed to seize it.
July/Augst 2026 | 25
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
