Security Tese gaps create blind spots, and that’s exactly where attackers


thrive. A single cyberattack rarely affects just one area of the business and can move very quickly across departments. What begins as a compromised account can rapidly become a wider operational issue affecting multiple business functions. Tis is why resilience depends on bringing together security, IT


operations, and recovery. When teams operate in silos, response efforts become slower and less effective. Security teams may be able to identify a threat but lack visibility into the business systems, applications, and services that the threat will reach. Without that context, it is impossible to assess the full business impact and prioritise response efforts. Recovery teams may even shiſt their focus to data restoration without a full awareness of ongoing security risks. Resilient organisations take a different approach, focusing on


creating a unified view of their environment, correlating information across systems, and reducing the blind spots that attackers rely on. Tis visibility quickly becomes a strategic requirement. Leaders


should be asking “can we see enough of our environment to understand risk and respond confidently when something goes wrong?” and then building their toolset around these needs.


Recovery has become part of the security conversation Backup and recovery have in the past been viewed as operational IT responsibilities and were discussed primarily in the context of hardware failures, accidental data loss, or business continuity planning. Cybersecurity and recovery were oſten separate conversations, but this approach no longer serves the needs of the business. Modern attackers understand that backup environments are


frequently an organisation’s last line of defence. As a result, they actively target backup repositories, administrative privileges, and recovery infrastructure as part of their attacks. Teir objective is to prevent recovery and increase pressure on the victim, oſten to ensure that a ransomware attack cannot be overcome by simply rolling back to a previous state. Recovery is a critical part of organisational resilience because the


success of this effort depends on more than how quickly systems can be brought back online. Organisations need confidence that critical systems can be recovered and that they are free from compromise. Speed is vital. However, recovery that prioritises speed alone can


create additional risks. Restoring corrupted data or reconnecting compromised systems into the environment can prolong an incident and undermine confidence in the recovery process. For recovery to be effective, organisations need both trust and


speed. Businesses must be confident that critical systems and data have been restored safely, while the organisation needs to be able to resume operations quickly enough to minimise disruption. Slow recovery extends the impact of an incident while untrusted recovery increases the likelihood of further disruption and security issues. Failing to achieve either can weaken resilience. Tis is why recovery readiness needs to be embedded into resilience


planning from the get-go, informing decisions around security infrastructure, operational processes and risk management. Tis is a core capability that enables organisations to withstand and recover from disruptions.


www.pcr-online.biz


Putting preparedness into practice Te organisations that respond most effectively to cyber incidents typically share several characteristics such as: • Maintaining visibility across their environments • Understanding critical dependencies • Regularly testing recovery processes • Clear coordination between teams before an incident. Tese capabilities cannot be developed during a crisis. Tey need to be built and improved through ongoing assessment and planning. Rather than wait for disaster, recovery plans should be tested through exercises, rather than draſted and forgotten about. Every incident, whether it’s a near miss or a successful cyberattack


that takes down vital services, provides valuable insight into where the blind spots or gaps are and where processes can be strengthened. Organisations that use these lessons to refine their approach will be better positioned to adapt to future challenges.


Why cyber readiness is a boardroom issue Getting this right isn’t the security team’s responsibility alone. Te impact of a cyber incident rarely stops with the technology


team, and it trickles down to customers, investors, and business partners. Regulatory scrutiny can increase following a major incident. Additionally, investors and business partners are also paying closer attention to how organisations manage cyber risks and maintain critical services. Tere are also growing regulatory expectations that place greater


emphasis on preparedness and recovery alongside traditional security controls. As organisations continue investing in AI and automation,


technology becomes increasingly central to business performance. Maintaining trust in those systems has therefore become a strategic priority, rather than just a technical concern. Te message of business resilience needs to come from the top


and is everyone’s responsibility: from understanding and following policies to understanding roles in a crisis. Boardrooms also need to give security teams the authority and resources to make good security decisions.


The real measure of success For many organisations, meeting the challenge of so many threats isn’t about a lack of tools, but a lack of connection between capabilities they already have. Technology investments remain important, but maintaining continuity depends on visibility and preparation. As threats continue to evolve, organisations should take a step


back and assess their environment, their confidence in their recovery processes, and alignment between the teams responsible for protecting and restoring critical systems. When problems are identified, the solution may be adding new tool, but it may be making better use of an existing tool, or changing policies to make them more effective. Te mindset that needs to change is one of identifying a problem


and then finding one tool that fixes that problem. Businesses need to invest in layers of security that will protect them, but those layers can only be effective when used to complement a resilience strategy that uses them appropriately. Without this, businesses risk deploying a patchwork of tools that will not offer the security and resilience they need.


July/Augst 2026 | 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52