search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Column: Design problem solvers


Providing repeatable tilt measurement under all conditions


By Chris Murphy, Applications Engineer, Analog Devices


My consumer-grade accelerometer can


theoretically measure < 1° of tilt. Will this still be possible over temperature changes and in the presence of vibration?


Answer:


Most likely the answer is no. Questions around definitive tilt accuracy values are always difficult to answer, since many environmental factors need to be accounted for when it comes to MEMS sensor performance. Typically, consumer-grade accelerometers struggle to detect less than 1° of tilt in dynamic environments. To show this, a general-purpose consumer-grade accelerometer is compared with a next-generation, low-noise, low-drift and low-power MEMS accelerometer. The comparison looks at a number of error sources present in tilt applications and what errors can be compensated for or removed. Errors such as zero-g bias accuracy, zero-g bias


shift due to soldering, zero-g bias shift due to PCB enclosure alignment, zero-g bias tempco, sensitivity accuracy and tempco, nonlinearity and cross-axis sensitivity are observable and can be reduced by the post-assembly calibration processes. Other error terms such as hysteresis, zero-g bias shift over life, sensitivity shift over life, zero-g shift due to humidity and PCB bend and twist due to temperature variations over time can’t be addressed in calibration, or else they require some level of in-situ servicing to be reduced. For this comparison it is assumed that cross-axis sensitivity, nonlinearity and sensitivity are compensated for, since they require much less effort to minimise compared to tempco offset drift and vibration rectification. Table 1 shows an estimate of the consumer-grade ADXL345 accelerometer’s ideal-performance specifica-


Table 1: ADXL345 error source estimates 16 December/January 2021 www.electronicsworld.com


Question:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68