search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trans RINA, Vol 161, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2019


composites. Delamination was also considered in his analysis. Using finite strip method Ashour (Ashour, 2009) studied vibration of skew plate. Rango et al. (Rango, et al., 2015) relied on trigonometric shear deformation theory to calculate the natural frequencies. Upadhyay and Shukla (Upadhyay & Shukla, 2013) and Shojaee et al. (Shojaee, et al., 2017) made use of Hamilton’s principle to do so.


However, HSDT was used in (Upadhyay & Shukla, 2013) whereas (Shojaee, et al., 2017) used FSDT.


Ardestani et al. (Ardestani, et al., 2017) and Zhang et al. (Zhang, et al., 2017) used HSDT and TSDT respectively while modelling thick skew laminates. In both the works isogeometric method was adopted. Similarly, meshless methods were adopted by Fallah and Delzendeh (Fallah & Delzendeh, 2018) and Liew et al. (Liew, et al., 2004). The moving least square Ritz (MLS-Ritz) method was used by Zhou and Zheng (Zhou & Zheng, 2008) and Zhang (Zhang, 2017). Fallah et al. (Fallah, et al., 2011) considered the use of multi-term extended Kantorovich method most appropriate for skew plate analysis. The Rayleigh-Ritz approach was used by quite a few researchers Like Mizusawa et al. (Mizusawa, et al., 1979) (Mizusawa, et al., 1980), Liew and Lam (Liew & Lam, 1990), Liew et al. (Liew, et al., 1993), Singh and Chakraverty (Singh & Chakraverty, 1994), Zeng and Bert (Zeng & Bert, 2001), Kumar et al. (Kumar, et al., 2015) (Kumar, et al., 2017), He et al. (He, et al., 2017). Wang (Wang, 1997) used B-spline Rayleigh-Ritz method based first order shear deformation theory for free vibration analysis of laminated composite skew plates. For analysis of free vibration of laminated composite skew plates, Anlas and Gooker (Anlas & Göker, 2001) used orthogonal polynomials with Ritz method. Makhecha et al. (Makhecha, et al., 2001) investigated dynamic responses of thick skew sandwich plates using C0QUAD-8 finite element based on a realistic higher-order theory. Effect of skew angle and thickness ratio on the dynamic characteristics of sandwich laminates subjected to


Table 1. Research works on skew plates. Source


Eftekhari and Jafari (Eftekhari & Jafari, 2013) Wang (Wang, 1997a) Wang (Wang, 1997b)


Kiani et al. (Kiani, et al., 2018) Malekzadeh (Malekzadeh, 2008) Bert and Malik (Bert & Malik, 1996)


Malekzadeh and Zarei (Malekzadeh & Zarei, 2014) Wang and Wu (Wang & Wu, 2013) Wang and Yuan (Wang & Yuan, 2018) Wang et al. (Wang, et al., 2014) Zamani et al. (Zamani, et al., 2012)


Malekzadeh and Fiouz (Malekzadeh & Fiouz, 2007)


Adineh and Kadkhodayan (Adineh & Kadkhodayan, 2017)


Malekzadeh and Karami (Malekzadeh & Karami, 2006)


thermal and mechanical loads have been studied. A high precision thick plate element has been developed by Sheikh and Haldar (Sheikh, et al., 2004) for free vibration analysis of composite plates in different situations. Numerical examples of plates having different shapes, boundary conditions, thickness ratio and fiber orientations have been analysed. Examples of plates having an internal cut-out and concentrated mass have also been studied. A simple C0 isoparametric finite element model based on a higher order shear deformation theory has been presented by Garg et al. (Garg, et al., 2006) for free vibration of isotropic, orthotropic and layered composite and sandwich skew laminates. Numerical results have been presented for natural frequencies of cross-ply and angle-ply with different lamination parameters, skew angles and boundary conditions. A nine node isoparametric plate bending element formulation has been developed by Pandit et al. (Pandit, et al., 2007) for free vibration analysis of isotropic and laminated composite plates. Numerical examples of isotropic and composite plates having different fiber orientations, aspect ratios, and thickness ratios have been solved and compared. Examples of plates having an internal cut-out and uniformly distributed mass on the plate have also been studied. Bending response of functionally graded skew sandwich plates has been analysed by Taj et al. (Taj, et al., 2014). A comprehensive list of works on skew isotropic and composite plates is presented in Table 1. From this review, the followings insights into the analysis of skew composite laminates are gained: • FSDT is by far the most popularly used theory for analysis of skew laminates.


• FEM, DQM and Rayleigh-Ritz are the most commonly applied numerical methods for this problem.


• Works involving static and dynamic analysis of skew shells are very limited.


• Works involving static and dynamic analysis of skew shells with cutouts are negligible.


Theory FSDT FSDT FSDT FSDT FSDT FSDT


Malekzadeh and Karami (Malekzadeh & Karami, 2005) FSDT Malekzadeh (Malekzadeh, 2007)


FSDT FSDT


FSDT FSDT


3D elasticity FSDT


Method


R-DQM Plate RRM RRM RM


DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM DQM


DQM


Structure ProblemType Vibration Vibration Buckling Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Buckling Vibration Vibration Bending Vibration


Plate Plate Shell Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate


Plate Vibration


A-362


©2019: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166