search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trans RINA, Vol 161, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2019 4. CONCLUSIONS


This paper proposes a numerical model to analyze SO2 absorption in seawater. SO2 scrubbers allow employing high-sulphur fuels with a low impact on sulphur emissions. In marine applications, seawater is


a


promising solution due to its availability. This paper proposes a numerical model to analyze SO2 absorption in seawater. A single seawater droplet was analyzed, and the developed model was used to predict the influence of several parameters on the desulphurization efficiency, such


as the droplet diameter, SO2 concentration,


alkalinity and temperature. Several tests were carried out using typical exhaust conditions of marine engines. It was found that a droplet of 200 µm initial diameter can absorb 1.77∙10-14 mol of S for the parameters analyzed, and this reduction improves when the alkalinity and SO2 concentration


temperature and gas


are increased and diameter, seawater temperature are reduced.


Differences up to of 21.5%, 19.8%, 2.2% and 16.3% in the S reduction were obtaining varying the SO2 initial concentration, alkaline initial concentration, initial liquid temperature and initial gas temperature respectively.


5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 10.


The authors would like to express their gratitude to “Talleres Pineiro, S.L.”, sale and repair of marine engines.


6. 1.


REFERENCES LAMAS,


11. M.I.,


RODRIGUEZ, J.D., modifications


Engineering 5(4), 2. to reduce


RODRIGUEZ, TELMO, J. pollutant


10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0148.


LAMAS, M.I., RODRIGUEZ, C.G., TELMO, J., RODRIGUEZ, J.D. Numerical analysis of emissions from marine engines using alternative fuels. Polish Maritime Research 22(4), 48-52, 2015. doi: 10.1515/pomr-2015-0070.


3.


LAMAS, M.I., RODRIGUEZ, C.G. Numerical model


2017. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.090. 4.


LAMAS, M.I., RODRIGUEZ, C.G. Numerical model


5.


SEDDIEK, I.S., ELGOHARI, M.M. Eco- friendly selection of ship emissions reduction strategies with emphasis on SOx and NOx emissions.


International Journal of Naval to study the combustion process and


emissions in the Wärtsilä 6L 46 four-stroke marine engine. Polish Maritime Research 20(2), 61-66, 2013. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2013-0017.


15. to analyze NOx reduction by ammonia


injection in diesel-hydrogen engines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42, 26132-26141,


14. doi: 13. C.G., Internal emissions


from marine engines. A numerical approach. Journal


of Naval Architecture and Marine 493-501,


2013. doi: 12. 8. 7. 6.


Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6, 737- 748, 2014. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0209. BARBOOTI, M.M.,


ANKOSH, A.H. Removal of nitrogen dioxide and sulphur


dioxide absorption in urea


IBRAHEEM, N.K., from air


streams by solution. Journal of


Environmental Protection 2, 6-14, 2011. doi: 10.4236/jep.2011.22020.


HIKITA, H., ASAI, S., TSUJI, T. Absorption of sulfur dioxide into aqueous sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite solutions. AICHE Journal. 23, 538-544, 1977. doi: 10.1002/aic.690230419.


LANCIA, A., MUSMARRA, D., PEPE, F. Modeling of SO2 absorption into limestone suspensions. Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research


36, 10.1021/ie9602365. 9.


PUSKAR, M., BIGOS, P., BALAZIKOVA, M., PETKOVA, V. The measurement method solving the characteristics


problems of engine caused by change


International Measurement Confederation 46, 467-475, 2013.


JEONG, S.M., KIM, S.D. Enhancement of the SO2 sorption capacity of CuO/γ-Al2O3 sorbent by an alkali-salt


promoter. Industrial &


Engineering Chemical Research. 36, 5425-5431, 1997. doi: 10.1021/ie970206h.


BOKOTKO, R.P., HUPKA, J., MILLER, J.D. Flue gas treatment for SO2 removal with air- sparged hydrocyclone


technology.


Environmental Science and Technology. 39, 1184-1189, 2005. doi: 10.1021/es035044x.


PYSZKO, R., BRESTOVIC, T., JASMINKA, N., LAZAR, M., MACHU, M., PUSKAR, M., TURISOVA, R. Measuring temperature of the atmosphere in the steelmaking furnace. Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 75,


10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.052. AMMAR,


92-103, N.R.,


SEDDIEK, 2015. doi: I.S. Eco-


environmental analysis of ship emission control methods: Case


Ocean Engineering 137, 166-173, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.052


ZHANG, D.N., CHEN, Q.Z., ZHAO, Y.X., MAEDA, Y., TSUJINO,


Y. Stack


OIKAWA, K., YONGSIRI, C., TAKEDA, K., HARIMOTO, T.


Seawater flue


16. WILLIAMS, P.J. Use of seawater as makeup water for wet flue gas desulfurization systems.


gas


desulfurization by seawater in Shanghai. Water Air and Soil Pollution 130, 271-276, 2001. doi: 10.1080/08940630.1988.10466438.


gas


desulfurization: its technical implications and performance results. Environmental Progress 22, 67-73, 2003. doi: 10.1002/ep.670220118.


study RO-RO cargo vessel.


output in


atmospheric conditions on the principle of the theory of optimal temperature range of exhaust system. Measurement: Journal of


the 197-203, 1997. doi:


A-342


©2019: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166