search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trans RINA, Vol 161, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2019 9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


This study is dedicated to commemorating the distinguished Prof E.V Telfer who was the founder of the branch of Naval Architecture of Istanbul Technical University (Baykal, 2015). He was also the first chairperson of this branch between 1946-1951 (Walker, 2010) and the first professor of Naval Architecture in Istanbul, Turkey (RINA, 1977).


This research was supported by the Coordination Unit of Scientific Research Projects of Istanbul Technical University (Project number: MGA-2017-40961).


10. 1.


2. 3.


REFERENCES 13.


BAYKAL, R. (2015) History of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering in Turkey. Istanbul: ITU Foundation Press.


BERTRAM, V. (2011) Practical ship hydrodynamics. Elsevier.


BROGLIA, R., ZAGHI, S. and DI MASCIO, A. (2011) ‘Numerical simulation of interference effects for a high-speed catamaran’, Journal of marine science and technology, 16(3), pp. 254– 269.


4.


CAKICI, F., SUKAS, O. F., KINACI, O. K. and ALKAN, A. D. (2017) ‘Prediction of the vertical motions of the dtmb 5415 ship using different numerical approaches’,Brodogradnja, 68(2), pp. 29–44. doi: 10.21278/brod68203.


5.


CARRICA, P. M., CASTRO, A. M. and STERN, F. (2010) ‘Self-propulsion computations using a speed controller and a discretized propeller with dynamic overset grids’, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 15(4), pp. 316–330. doi: 10.1007/s00773-010-0098-6.


6.


CASTRO, A. M., CARRICA, P. M. and STERN, F. (2011) ‘Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS’, Computers & Fluids, 51(1), pp. 35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.07.005.


7. 8.


CD-adapco, S. (2017) ‘STAR CCM+ User Guide Version 12.04’, CD-Adapco: New York, NY, USA.


CELIK, I. B., GHIA, U., ROACHE, P. J., FREITAS, C. J., COLEMAN, H. and RAAD, P. E. (2008) ‘Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications’, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(7), pp. 78001–78004. doi: 10.1115/1.2960953.


9.


DELEN, C. and BAL, S. (2015a) ‘Uncertainty Analysis of Resistance Tests in Ata Nutku Ship Model Testing Laboratory of Istanbul Technical University’, in Towards Green Marine Technology and Transport - Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the International


14. 10.


Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2015.


DELEN, C. and BAL, S. (2015b) ‘Uncertainty Analysis of Resistance Tests in Ata Nutku Ship Model Testing Laboratory of Istanbul Technical University’, Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, 1(2 (2015)), pp. 8–27.


11. 12.


DELEN, C., SEZEN, S. and BAL, S. (2017) ‘Computational Investigation of Self Propulsion Performance of Darpa Suboff Vehicle’, Tamap Journal of Engineering, 2017(4).


DOGRUL, A., SEZEN, S., DELEN, C. and BAL, S. (2017) ‘Self-propulsion simulation of DARPA Suboff’, The International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM 2017). Edited by C. G. Soares. Lisbon, Portugal.


GAGGERO, S., VILLA, D. and VIVIANI, M. (2017) ‘An extensive analysis of numerical ship self-propulsion prediction via a coupled BEM/RANS approach’, Applied Ocean Research,


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2017.05.005.


GAGGERO, S., VILLA, D. and VIVIANI,, M. (2015) ‘The Kriso Container Ship (Kcs) Test Case: An Open Source Overview’, VI International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (MARINE 2015). Edited by F. Salvatore and R. Muscari. Rome, Italy.


15.


GARCÍA-GÓMEZ, A. (2000) ‘On the form factor scale effect’, Ocean Engineering, 27(1), pp. 97–109. Available at: https://ac.els- cdn.com/S0029801898000420/1-s2.0- S0029801898000420-main.pdf?_tid=d99f2015- 23e2-46f3-8c07- 7496a5816544&acdnat=1546948873_821d7d83 f9495b43878f39cc5e851168.


16. 17.


GOKCE, M. K., KINACI, O. K. and ALKAN, A. D. (2018) ‘Self-propulsion estimations for a bulk carrier’, Ships and Offshore Structures, pp. 1–8.


HAASE, M., ZURCHER, K., DAVIDSON, G., BINNS, J. R., THOMAS, G. and BOSE, N. (2016) ‘Novel CFD-based full-scale resistance prediction for large medium-speed catamarans’, Ocean Engineering, 111, pp. 198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.018.


18. 19.


20. 21. 22.


ITTC (2002a) Recommended Procedures and Guidelines - Resistance Test - 7.5-02-02-0.


ITTC (2002b) ‘Testing and Extrapolation Methods Resistance Uncertainty Analysis, Example for Resistance Test’, in.


ITTC (2011a) ‘1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Method - 7.5 – 02-03 – 01.4’, in International Towing Tank Conference.


ITTC (2011b) ‘Recommended Procedures and Guidelines - Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications - 7.5-03-02-03’, in International Towing Tank Conference.


ITTC (2011c) ‘Recommended Procedures and Guidelines - Resistance Test - 7.5-02-02-01’, in


66, pp. 55–78. doi:


A-476


©2019: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166