search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Trans RINA, Vol 161, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2019


come to the front and become an advanced country in the field of maritime in the future with a convenient and efficient policy.


3. METHODOLOGY


As mentioned, SWOT-AHP integrated method will be used in this study and a 2-stage system will be applied. First, SWOT analysis will be carried out and as a result of this, the strategies of SO, WO, ST and WT will be determined. In the second stage, the most appropriate strategy as a result of SWOT analysis will be determined by applying AHP.


In SWOT analysis; the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Turkey's maritime transportation will be determined. In order to determine these, the past and recent studies on maritime transportation will be examined and the opinions of the experts in the maritime areas will be utilized (Celik and Kandakoglu, 2012). As a result of a SWOT study, the components are compared to each other and one of the four main strategies of SO, WO, ST and WT is recommended (Arslan and Turan, 2009).


SO strategies are the strategy of a company, organization or policy that is used for obtaining the inherent strength of the situation to be taken advantage of external opportunities (Arslan and Turan, 2009). All managers and policy-makers wish to ensure that their situation or events meet these requirements.


WO strategies are the strategies to use the opportunities offered by the external environment (Arslan and Turan, 2009). This strategy is implemented by taking into account the weaknesses of the situation or event to be analyzed.


ST strategies are the strategies that block the threats from the external environment of the situation or event to be analyzed (Arslan and Turan, 2009). It is a strategy that allows the efforts to reduce or minimize the disadvantages.


WT strategies are strategies for minimizing or avoiding threats from the external environment by taking into account the weaknesses of the situation or event to be analyzed (Arslan and Turan, 2009).


The components of the SWOT matrix indicate the necessary alternatives. The AHP model can be established by using the main criteria as opportunities, threats, strengths and weaknesses and the alternatives as SO, WO, ST and WT strategies.


4. SWOT ANALYSIS (1st STAGE)


The history of SWOT analysis dates back to the 1960s. It is a decision analysis method that has been used and disposed for decision support for many years (Stahlbock


and Voss, 2011). The main objective of the SWOT analysis is to describe strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and to transform weaknesses to strengths and to turn threats into opportunities to create a source of information for strategies (Kececi and Arslan, 2017). The most important aspect of the SWOT analysis is that it allows the organization to evaluate both internal and external situation.


After the SWOT analysis and determination of the directions of the enterprises or businesses, a matrix is created (Joyce, 2015). The created matrix presents the opportunities beyond the enterprise together with the strengths to be used to turn these opportunities into success, the risks that pose the business and the weaknesses that may be dangerous.


With the help of this introduction, Turkey’s strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the field of maritime transportation can be explored and diagnosed in many ways. These can be determined by conducting a scientific survey, documents, reports, publication screening or literature review. As a result of SWOT analysis, the factors that may and will have an impact on maritime transportation can be revealed more concretely.


SWOT analysis can be done in two sub-analyzes (Celik and Kandakoglu, 2012). One of them is the analysis of the internal environment that shows the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. The other sub-analysis is the external environment analysis and that identifies opportunities and threats that may affect the organization.


4.1


DETERMINING STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES


If Turkey's maritime transportation’s internal environment to be investigated; the subdomain of maritime related institutions, organizations, companies, associations and areas of maritime trade in Turkey should be examined. In addition, the relationship between these institutions, organizations, corporations and companies in sub-areas related to maritime trade should be examined (Alderton and Saieva, 2013).


The maritime shipbuilding market and the institutions providing maritime education can also be considered in internal analysis in Turkey. These also include maritime companies, institutions and organizations that set up maritime legislation. People who are competent in maritime, ministries and maritime law are in direct interaction with the maritime sector (Shi and Li, 2017). These institutions and organizations that make up the maritime legislation provide international and national norms, laws and rules to the shipbuilding sector, the maritime education institutions and the maritime companies (Alderton and Saieva, 2013). The formation of new companies, the construction of new ships, the construction of new ports and marinas, and the opening of new educational institutions are the key elements to be considered in the internal environment analysis (Rodrigue et al., 2009).


©2019: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


A-439


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166