Trans RINA, Vol 161, Part A4, Intl J Maritime Eng, Oct-Dec 2019
is the maximum moisture content of a cargo that is considered safe for transportation in ships. It is calculated as 90% of the Flow Moisture Point (FMP) (Bureau Veritas, 2018).
Under the influence of the ship’s movement, motions and vibrations, the cargo compacts and the space volume between the particles reduces, which causes the pore water pressure to rise, reducing the shear strength of the particles(Gouvernec, 2018). The total quantity of cargo in one or all of the holds starts to behave as a dense liquid and reduces the ship’s stability by the free surface effect (see Figure 1). In the worst case the ship might even capsize (Lee, 2017).
1.3 TRANSPORTABLE MOISTURE LIMIT (TML)
Cargoes that have been identified as those ‘which may liquefy’ according the IMSBC code must have a signed certificate of moisture content provided by the shipper to the ship’s master or his representative, including a signed certificate of the transportable moisture limit (TML) as required by Section 4, regulation 4.3.2 of the IMSBC Code.
The TML should be tested and certified according to one of three methods prescribed in the regulatory guidelines by a recognized laboratory.
Following SOLAS Chapter VI, Part A, Regulation 2(1) “The shipper shall provide the master or his representative with appropriate information on the cargo sufficiently in advance of loading…” and “Such information shall be in writing…”.
The IMSBC Code, Section 4, Regulation 4.1.4: stipulates
that “The various properties of a solid bulk cargo… shall be determined… in accordance with the test procedures approved by a competent authority in the country of origin…”
As required by the IMSBC Code, a certificate of moisture content must be provided by the shipper to the master stating the current moisture content with the interval between testing and loading being not more than seven days.
The master must satisfy himself that the moisture content of the cargo is not more than the transportable moisture limit. If the moisture content or MC of the cargo is smaller than the TML, loading may proceed.
The liquefaction of certain types of bulk cargo gave rise to concern with the shipping industry. BIMCO or the Baltic and International Maritime Council, representing the ship owners interest, developed on 25 July 2012 some new charter party clauses for use in time- and voyage charter parties which may involve the carriage of bulk cargoes such as nickel ore and iron ore fines which are at risk of liquefying (BIMCO, 2012).
2.
LIQUEFYING CARGO AND THE STABILITY OF BULK CARRIERS
Some more details regarding the stability of bulk carriers carrying liquefying cargo are provided below.
WL: Water Line M: Metacentre G: Centre of gravity of the ship Gv: Virtual centre of gravity of the ship K: Keel g: centre of gravity cargo GZ: righting arm of stability moment GvZv: righting arm of stability moment after free surface correction B: Centre of buoyancy AA1: Original liquid surface TT1: Liquid surface after cargo shift
Figure 1. The free surface effect
GZ is the righting arm of the stability moment that brings a ship back to its original position when inclined by an external force. The GZ is reduced to GvZv due to the presence of free moving masses on board. This effect is called the free surface effect (FS) (Figure 1).
The magnitude of this free surface effect on the GZ curve can be formulated as follows:
δG = ρ∑LB³ 12∆ (1)
Gv is the virtual center of gravity, ρ is the cargo bulk density (t/m³), Δ is the ship’s loaded displacement (t), L is the length of the free surface (m), B breath of the free surface (m) and ∑LB³/12 = total volumetric heeling moment of the cargo free surface (m4). α is the surface angle of repose, or for cargo that is transported above the safe TML α = 20° (Clarck, 2008).
The result is a serious reduction of the righting arm of the stability moment,
= 0 − sin (2) Where G0Z is the initial GZ, and θ is the angle of heel. A-420 ©2019: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166