search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Regulatory PRRC requirements


The requisite expertise shall be demonstrated by either of the following qualifications: (a) A diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualification, awarded on completion of a university degree or of a course of study recognised as equivalent by the member state concerned, in law, medicine, pharmacy, engineering or another relevant scientific discipline, and at least one year of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems relating to medical devices.


(b) Four years of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems relating to medical devices. Without prejudice to national provisions regarding professional qualifications, manufacturers of custom-made devices may demonstrate the requisite expertise referred to in the first subparagraph by having at least two years of professional experience within a relevant field of manufacturing.


Source: MDR and IVDR


statements according to a set of conditions required for the technical documentation, which can be found in Annex II, 1.1 of the IVDR 2017/746 document. Annex VIII contains the rules to be followed to determine the classification of the device, and is intended to be read and applied in sequence with Annex II. Therefore, referring as necessary to the documents (a), (c) and (d) listed on page 15, manufacturers must start by reviewing the implementing rules in chapter one. For example, is the device intended to be used in combination with another device? This is a particularly relevant question for software. After this, manufacturers must


read through the seven classification rules in chapter two and work through them step by step in order to arrive at a classification that best describes the device under consideration. It is important to document the decision on the classification and the supporting justification, as this is another required item in Annex II, 1.1, listed as follows: (e) the risk class of the device and the justification for the classification rule(s) applied in accordance with Annex VIII. Finally, it is also important to determine if the product is considered as a companion diagnostic (CDx), which is a specific type of IVD. CDx was not defined under the IVDD. But the IVDR, as well as ISO 20916, close this gap by defining CDx and identifying requirements for clinical performance studies. The EU IVDR defines a CDx as a device that is essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding medicinal product to identify – before and/or during treatment – patients who are most likely to benefit from the corresponding medicinal product, or who are likely to be at increased risk of serious adverse reactions as a result of treatment with the corresponding medicinal product.


Responsible persons


As with MDR and IVDR, the regulations oblige European companies to have a regulatory expert –


16


Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170