search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FIT AND PROPER... WORTHING TAXI DRIVER LOSES LICENCE FOR ‘INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOUR’ WITH FEMALE PASSENGER


Mohamed Alkhayat was at Worthing Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, Feb- ruary 5, to appeal against his private hire driver’s licence being revoked on August 7 by Wor- thing Borough Council. The Worthing Her- ald reports that Magistrates Chair- man William Gib- bons dismissed the appeal. He said: “We feel both the stan- dard of driving and behaviour of Mr Alkhayat fell below the accepted stan- dards of a licensed


driver.” The court heard how Mr Alkhayat touch- ed a young woman’s leg during the jour- ney. Mr Gibbons said: “He claimed her leg was close to the gearbox. This isn’t accepted by the bench.” He was seen to kiss her hand without permission, Mr Gib- bons said, and tried to exchange phone numbers with her, which the chairman found ‘totally inap- propriate’. During another jour- ney from Gatwick Airport to Worthing,


Mohamed Alkhayat


CCTV footage show- ed Mr Alkhayat driv- ing while using his mobile phone and without a seat belt before picking up his passenger. His highest recorded speed was 85mph,


and he was seen driving with one hand on the wheel, the court heard. In an interview with Worthing Borough Council on August 6, Mr Alkhayat said he ‘felt more com- fortable’ with one hand on the wheel and admitted he was ‘overfriendly’ with the female pas- senger, Mr Gibbons said. He said ‘other incidents had been reported to Arrow Taxis that were not investigated fur- ther’. After the decision, Arrow Taxis com-


STOCKTON PHV DRIVER’S LICENCE SUSPENDED AFTER OUTBURST AT PARKING WARDEN


A taxi driver who was once banned from driving has now been suspend- ed for a foul- mouthed outburst at a parking war- den. TeessideLive reports that Middlesbrough Council has taken action after a com- plaint


from a


Stockton Council parking patrol offi- cer.


Details of the sus- pension of the private hire driver’s licence have been set out in newly re- leased council li- censing committee documents. The driver has not been identified fol- lowing the row, which took place on


72


November 5. Councillors heard that the parking officer alleged the driver used “foul and abusive” lan- guage towards them in a public place. The driver was inter- viewed by a li- censing enforce- ment officer on Dec- ember


17. He


claimed the parking warden mouthed the word “moth- er******” at him during the row, but the council said there was no evi- dence of this. The driver added he regretted the inci- dent and was ex- tremely remorseful. Bodycam video foot- age of the incident was also shown to


councillors. The meeting heard how the driver had received a warning in 2001 after a row over allowing a guide dog in his vehicle. He was sent on a driver improvement scheme in 2011 after racking up three speeding offences and using a mobile phone. The driver surren- dered his licence later that year after a further speeding offence led to a driving ban. He re-applied to get his licence back in 2013, which was refused, but was successful after a further application a year later.


Mi d d l e s b r o u g h Council suspended the driver’s private hire licence for four weeks after breach- ing its code of conduct. It said: “The com- mittee considered it was wholly unac- ceptable for a licensed driver to insult and swear at an official carrying out their duties which was also a clear breach of the driver’s conditions and his code of con- duct.”


Mmmm… With res- pect, does this council really believe that a person with such a previous record will reform his character after four weeks? – Ed.


mented: “This in- dividual was never actually employed by Arrow Taxi Group although did sub- contract taxi book- ings as a self- employed Worthing licensed driver. “Upon being in- formed of these incidents the driver was suspended from fulfilling any further booking through our booking agency. “Internal reports were produced based on our recorded data (vehicle GPS, driver activity etc.) and statements were obtained from all


individuals involved. We advised all par- ties to report the incident to Wor- thing Taxi Licensing and the local police station. “We contacted Wor- thing licensing auth- orities and provided all recorded evi- dence and incident reports with state- ments. “The driver in this instance has not received sub-con- tracted work from Arrow since and we are relieved that an appropriate conclu- sion has been reached.”


ELLESMERE PORT TAXI DRIVER FINED


An Ellesmere Port taxi driver has appeared at Chester Magistrates’ Court for breaking private hire rules. CheshireLive reports that Mohamed Dar- da, 44, broke the law by accepting an immediate booking in his private hire vehicle. The court heard how the driver had picked up two mem- bers of the public off the street in his Toyota Avensis and had then transport- ed them to Dares- bury. The council’s licens- ing team launched an investigation fol- lowing a report they received on the evening of the


event. It was later found that there was no prior booking in place when checks were made with his private hire opera- tor. The court heard how Mr Darda had lied in his initial interview but later revealed the truth. He pleaded guilty to all charges and was fined £261. He received six penalty points for invalidat- ing his insurance and was ordered to pay £85 costs and a victim surcharge of £32. The council’s Gener- al Licensing Sub- Committee will now review the licence held by Mr Darda.


MARCH 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112