search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CCS projects vary widely in terms of complexity. The early circular systems in the US, for example, were relatively easy: oil and gas were piped to a gas processing plant where carbon dioxide was separated, pumped back along the parallel pipelines, and injected back into the oil and gas field to enhance oil & gas production.


However, not all projects are as straightforward. In the UK, there are plans to capture 20-30 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2030 and 50 million by 2035. This could rise to as much as 180 million tonnes by 2050. There is close to 80 billion tonnes of storage capacity on the UK Continental Shelf, sufficient to store hundreds of years’ worth of carbon dioxide but there are challenges as some of the subsea aquifers are located offshore and relatively far away from the industrial clusters where the carbon dioxide is collected and sequestered before going offshore for storage. For this, transport is required, either by pipeline or ship. And this combination of requirements, Pearson says, is where the economics become complicated.


EU ETS a key driver


For a successful project, a series of unlinked but interdependent organisations and companies must do their own sums and establish a sound and profitable business model for capturing and sequestering carbon dioxide. Only then can a final investment decision be taken. And of course, the simpler the chain, the easier the projects are to progress. The cost of carbon is a prime factor too and in Europe, the EU Emissions Trading System will play a key role.


Dr Chet Biliyok, Petrofac’s Technical Director, Energy Transition Projects, compares the backdrop in Europe with that of the US. There, he says, for industries with highly concentrated carbon dioxide streams, coupled with a short distance from the carbon capture facility to the subterranean


storage site (typically a depleted oil and gas reservoir), a carbon dioxide cost as low as $25 a tonne can be realised. In Europe, however, where carbon dioxide will mostly be stripped from sources where it is more diffuse, the distances to storage sites are greater and there is no existing infrastructure, the challenge is starting from scratch. The cost could be as much as $200 a tonne.


“So in this case, we need the Emissions Trading System, with meaningful emissions allowance prices, to make the economics work,” he adds.


Shipping potential


Biliyok notes a range of exciting opportunities in shipping. There has been some talk around deploying carbon capture units on vessels to strip out carbon dioxide from exhaust gases during transit, which can then be offloaded at ports. Yet, daunting hurdles such as the limitation of space onboard exist, along with the results of a recent study from SINTEF in Norway showing that ship fuel consumption will double to accommodate the weight of the additional capture system. This limits the deployment of onboard carbon capture to a non-competitive slugfest with low carbon or zero emission fuels.


However, one undeniable opportunity is the merchant transport of carbon dioxide by sea and inland waterway, which will be a key element of decarbonisation in Europe. There’s little technical challenge here, he says, because there is already a wide body of knowledge in cryogenics and the sea transport of gases in liquid form.


LNG, for example, is shipped by sea at -162°C. LPG carriers, on the other hand, use a combination of pressure and temperatures to carry cargoes typically at about -45°C to -30°C. A similar arrangement would be required to ship carbon dioxide at scale, with gas carriers transporting carbon dioxide at slightly elevated pressure but


82 | ISSUE 110 | DEC 2024 | THE REPORT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148