search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IV Rule 2b. Article IV rule 6 provides for the shipper’s indemnity in the case of dangerous goods, where that have been shipped without the carrier’s knowledge or consent.


A number of issues can arise with regard to unseaworthiness, including that: dangerous cargo can, of itself, make a vessel unseaworthy; faulty systems can make a vessel unseaworthy; and crew without proper training can make a vessel unseaworthy. Whether the carrier acted as a prudent owner can be a complex question because it may not be clear before or at the commencement of the voyage that a battery forming part of the cargo was defective and the carrier will not usually check on the contents of a container itself. Instead, it will rely on the documentation provided by the shipper. Nonetheless, in the context of unseaworthiness, hidden dangers are relevant.


As to the exercise of reasonable care in taking care of the cargo, given that the current regulatory regime for the carriage by sea of EVs and Li-ion batteries is arguably inadequate, complying with the regulations may


not be enough. Query whether a prudent owner should refuse to carry EVs/Li-ion batteries at all, although this may not be a realistic option given their increasing use and the continuing growth of the market.


Instead, a carrier may focus on ensuring it keeps up-to-date and complies with industry guidance, obtains expert risk assessments and establishes internal processes for identifying the contents of containers and where to stow EVs and Li-ion batteries. It has also been suggested that carriers should not allow onboard charging, although they will come under a lot of pressure from charterers/shippers if they do not. An owner may also wish to liaise with its P&I Club on appropriate measures to ensure that its cover remains in place.


The shipper’s liability for shipping dangerous goods without the carrier’s knowledge or consent is a strict one. However, the indemnity will not be engaged where the loss has been caused by the carrier’s failure to exercise due diligence. It is, therefore, in the shipper’s interest to provide all the relevant documentation and make the


66 | ISSUE 110 | DEC 2024 | THE REPORT


relevant declarations with regard to the cargo. This may minimise its exposure as to lack of carrier knowledge/consent and will allow the carrier to stow the goods appropriately and take any necessary precautionary measures.


COMMENT


It is to be hoped that Li-ion fire risks will reduce over time as manufacturers, carriers, and regulators address the current challenges. In the meantime, there is an ongoing debate in the maritime industry about whether there should be dedicated RoRo vessels for EVs. This is something that insurers say they would like to see.


Another future consideration is how the risks associated with the carriage of EVs and Li-ion batteries will be dealt with on autonomous ships. Where there are no, or few, human crew onboard, will this make it harder to fight any resulting fires? Technological advances in shipping are to be welcomed and are the way forward, but they do present the industry with novel challenges.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148