SAFE T Y
Briefings
Preventing cargo damage through hatch cover maintenance
According to the American P&I Club, the ingress of seawater through leaking hatch covers remains one of the most significant causes of cargo damage aboard dry cargo vessels. Cargo damaged by water leaking through hatch covers can result in large claims and affect Members’ claims records. Most leakage problems occur because of poor maintenance. Hatch covers will leak if:
– compression surfaces are not aligned correctly due to worn bearing pads, locator and/or stoppers;
– gasket sections are damaged, missing, worn, over compressed or inserted in short lengths;
– there are cracks or holes in the plating; or – there is permanent overall distortion of the hatch covers.
Members have an obligation to exercise due diligence in ensuring that hatch cover maintenance and regular weathertightness testing is conducted on board their vessels as an integral part of each vessel’s planned maintenance system. This should include the following steps:
– The creation of a detailed shipboard maintenance plan based on the hatch cover manufacturer’s build, operation and maintenance specifications.
– The provision and upkeep of adequate spare parts and seals.
– Crew training to ensure the proper implementation of the shipboard maintenance plan.
– Shore based management’s commitment for close follow-up of the maintenance plan and its implementation.
– Regular testing, and logging results, of hatch weathertightness by the vessel’s crew and/or independent surveyors using high-pressure hose testing, or preferably by testing with approved ultrasonic hatch leak detection instruments. In reference to step 5 above, although high-pressure hose testing before loading cargo in combination with chalk imprint testing are helpful indicators of hatch covers’ weathertightness, the exact location of any leaks that may occur are almost impossible to pinpoint and repair due to the tendency of water to travel laterally from the point of ingress.
In addition, a hose test can show whether the physical contact between rubber packings and their mating surfaces are satisfactory in static conditions. With the hose test, however, the compression of the rubber packings cannot be assessed. When the vessel is at sea, and in dynamic conditions, even in a in case of light movement, only a small distortion of the hatch covers could result in the hatch cover panels flexing, and under these circumstances the water may find its way to the hold.
On the other hand, an over-compressed rubber packing may also lose its sealing capability while in dynamic
conditions at sea, since its rigidity will not be able to compensate for the vessel’s movement. Accordingly, a chalk test or hose-test cannot guarantee the weathertight condition of the hatch covers and may affect various cargoes that are sensitive to water contamination, wetness or even moisture content in the air.
Ultrasonic equipment uses sounds with frequency above 20 KHz that cannot be heard by the human ear. It can more reliably indicate the integrity of the packing rubber and its ability to compensate for movement between the panels and the hatch coaming (as well as in between adjacent panels) when the vessel is at sea, and in dynamic conditions. This is crucial in preventing water ingress.
The ultrasonic emitter is placed in the centre of the cargo hold tank top with hatch covers open, activated and the operator of ultrasonic testing (UST) equipment then measures the open hatch value (OHV). Then vessel’s crew close hatch covers, and the operator of the UST equipment checks for ultrasound signals passing through the rubber packing and compression bar interface of the hatch covers and records the location of any leaks for subsequent repair or adjustment of the packing. The acceptable range of leakage is less than 10% of the OHV. Any discontinuity in the seal (e.g., missing or damaged rubber packing) or area with lack of compression (e.g., wavy or deformed compression bar) will allow ultrasound to pass and the leaky spot identified as an area of concern.
The ultrasound tightness testing of the hatch covers is an accurate, non-destructive method, which can be used under all weather conditions without the risk of damaging the cargo during testing, allowing easy detection of the defected areas/points, thus facilitating appropriate repairs, if required.
The Club recommends that Members equip their dry cargo vessels with ultrasonic hatch cover leak-detection instruments to be used by the vessel’s crew to regularly check for weathertightness. The cost of such prudent investment will amount to far less than any potential cargo claim that could have been avoided by detection and repair of leakage areas prior to potential water damage.
THE REPORT | DEC 2024 | ISSUE 110 | 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148
