search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Michael Bates-Tracey, associate and architect, FWP


FWP is a multidisciplinary practice. We do a lot of sport and leisure projects and healthcare on the public sector side.


We have a sports project that has been in planning for around 12 months and we’re still 12 months from actually submitting the application.


There’s now such a massive upfront cost for developers to put a planning application in. The validation requirements, the list is just so long.


Paul Darwin, land director, Anwyl Homes


We’re a family house builder with a number of sites in Lancashire. For us to be able to build we need planning permission.


If you look at the statutory timescales, they have gone out of the window. You’re supposed to have 13 weeks for a planning application decision but most of the time you’re lucky if you’ve got it in six months. Sometimes it could take 12 months to get planning.


We have a site outside Lancashire that’s been in planning for two years so it’s a long process and that’s from the moment you submit your application. You’ve got pre-application discussions as well which, again, can take anywhere up to six months.


Keeping up with the government’s ambition on housebuilding is hard. The public sector has been cut to bits in terms of staff resources. Planning budgets aren’t ringfenced any more. There is a lot of investment needed to get the right people in.


We want to build well-designed, good family houses and it is really refreshing to see the impetus Labour is putting into it. Having a positive approach is definitely needed because there are councils in some areas that have just sat on their hands and said, ‘We don’t need any new development’.


It’s how the government can push people to deliver things, whether that’s reallocating officers, deemed permissions in certain areas or speeding up the appeals processes.


We have torn up a lot of things that


worked and we have a lot of stuff that act as barriers


Take a speculative co-living space development. The outline planning and the validation requirements, you just think, ‘wow’. You can’t believe the amount you


have to actually put in for an application.


When it comes to the amount of time things take, yes, we know there have to be consultations with different people and bodies, but it is about taking ownership of schemes when they come into the local authority. Someone needs to take that ownership and grab hold of it.


Communication is key, just picking up the phone and speaking to people, having a conversation and saying, ‘Look this is what we’re trying to do’ and that’s been lost. It’s emails back and forth that aren’t actually resolving anything.


The problems have been going on for some time and in terms of giving local authorities some extra money, I don’t think it really touches the surface.


Deborah Smith, co-founder, S&L Planning Consultants


Unless you are an experienced developer you are not going to ‘ have a go’ because things are just too uncertain.


More certainty is needed, more resources. We need a chief planner installed in every authority. Historically they held a wealth of information about an area and experience, because planning is really complicated sometimes.


In restructure after restructure


chief planners disappeared and they are the people you should got to if you’re having a problem.


Money has been put aside for 300 new planning officers to go into local authorities. I’ve read there are 90 graduates on the trainee scheme at the moment but that’s not the level that’s needed.


It’s more experienced planners that are needed but I guess you’ve got to start somewhere. Then there’s the challenge of keeping them because historically people will work in the local authority sector and then move into the private sector.


Morale tends to be very low in quite a lot of local authorities and it’s bound to be if all the planning officers get is, ‘Where’s my planning up to? Have you done mine, where is it up to?’ You constantly get berated.


We need some collaboration across local authority areas with strategic planning, which was scrapped years ago. To add a strategic layer back in makes a lot of sense to me.


STAY UP TO DATE WITH LANCASHIRE’S


PROPERTY NEWSLETTER Scan to subscribe today


28 PLANNING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88