search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IBT


CedarPark, USA


I2 Core » Typical users are community banks and credit unions with assets under $1b » Microsoft-based system written in C# and .Net with SQL as database » Most customers use the core system on a hosted model » Supports core, payments, online banking and document management


i2 Core IBT


Origins


IBT is a privately-held banking software provider based in Texas. It started off as Guaranty Technology, a subsidiary of Austin-based Guaranty Bank. It was renamed as Integrated Bank Technology (IBT) when it split from the bank. Co-founders were Mike Shubert, who worked at deposits imaging specialist, Dataworks Inc, and Charles Capel, one of the original developers of the Norcross, GA-derived BancPac system, which today resides with FIS. Today, Shubert is CIO and Capel is COO. Capel worked at Guaranty Bank in the mid-1990s, joined Dataworks Inc, then rejoined Guaranty Bank in 1998 as VP of data processing and formed the subsidiary, Guaranty Technology. Today’s president is Mike Golebioski, who was CEO of


acquired company, MICR Resource Management (see below). IBT CEO is Mark Dittman, who joined at the start of 2005 from Banking Equipment Services Inc. Guaranty Bank acted as the development partner for the new system, which allowed the developers to gain feedback from its captive customer and adapt the system as it went along. It remains a user, albeit not a shareholder. IBT claims to offer complete enterprise-wide automation


for financial institutions across core, mobile and payments solutions from a single code base and one central database. Dittman pointed out that when IBT set out, it knew it needed a reason for banks to consider it alongside the strong existing suppliers. One difference was a focus on community banks and providing the levels of service that they needed, something that it was felt that larger suppliers were unable to deliver. ‘In the last few years, we feel there has been a vacancy especially in that marketplace,’ he said. Most of the clients for IBT have migrated from the ‘big three’ suppliers and have been recruited at a faster rate than initially expected, he added. The new supplier also wanted to avoid the scenario of larger suppliers whereby they provide perhaps ten different applications to a single customer. That customer has ten different numbers to call for support and ‘so no cohesive interaction even though it has bought from one supplier’, said Dittman. ‘One system, with all of the functionality in one database, was a fundamental cornerstone.’ There is also a single release, with all customers upgraded at once. The same solution is sold to banks as is sold to credit unions. This considerably eases the task of enhancing the platform, including for regulatory changes. The system is written in C# and .Net, with SQL as the database, so is firmly in the Microsoft camp.


US Financial Services Technology Market Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 87


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132