search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Core Banking System Trends Overview gration, which boosts efficiency and performance.


There are some common themes when looking at what banks state as their main drivers and goals for changing a core banking system. There is plenty of chopping and changing and some of the common themes that prompt banks to change their core systems include:


• Vendor Dissatisfaction. vice


levels, include inadequate Casey integration


Unsatisfactory ser- support


and


poor user-friendliness have led many banks to change their core banking systems. Typical exam- ples





Outsourcing. Creating cost efficiencies, decreas- ing


overheads and reducing periodic State Bank and Busey Bank. hardware


and software capital expense have driven banks to move to a hosted model. Typical examples here include Oak Bank and Hawaii National Bank.





Improved Channel Delivery. Banks looking for greater channel integration, flexibility and consistency across channels have opted to mi- grate to a different, more modern core system. The modern core


interfaces with new channel prod- uct offerings and provides a greater level of inte- • •


Broader Product Range. Legacy systems do not al- ways support the expansion of a bank’s product range. Success with one product often opens up new avenues for a bank. More often than not, the legacy core system is not flexible enough to be customized to accommodate


this growth, prompting the


bank


to change the core banking system. A case in point would be Barclays US, whose success with credit card services opened the doors to the possibility of new revenue streams like online retail and consumer deposits. Barclays US was forced into changing its core, as deposit products couldn’t be accommodated in the bank’s existing system.


Technical Improvement. The need for greater automation, efficiency and scalability has driven banks to consider the adoption of a new core system. Fur- thermore, many legacy platforms are coded in now un- supported languages, which makes improvement and overhaul impossible. Notable examples of such migra- tion include Peoples Independent Bank and Libertyville Savings Bank.


Channel Trends Overview


The US market has seen a greater degree of innovation in banking channels as compared to that in core banking systems. In some areas, the US banks have even moved beyond many of their non-US counterparts.





Branch. The branch has been the focus of many US banks in the past. However, with the advent of online banking, branches have seen a steep drop in customer transac- tions. The fall in branch footfall in US banks over the last 5 years has been around 50 per cent with a similar per- centage drop in revenue per member of staff. Neverthe- less, owing to the importance of customer relationship in banking, branches are still seen as being an important channel. However, there is a need to make them more


6


efficient and improve the ability of the staff to serve and cross-sell to customers.





Interactive Tellers. One of the technology enablers is the interactive teller, which incorporates the use of video. Video-enabled ATMs make use of a remote teller who can interact with the customer over vid- eo, take control of the machine and guide custom- ers through most branch transactions. Another en- abler is the tablet, which gives mobility to in-branch staff, allowing them to interact with customers, and provide


better • service and cross-market products.


Specialist Suppliers. Banks are increasingly moving to different, specialized vendors for different chan-


US Financial Services Technology Market Report | www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132