search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REGULATION ‘We’re in a similar position to a year ago’


But it’s hard to see how that would not be the practical effect. I would be surprised if the government took that forward. “The other point is the limit


could apply to the total price, the average cost per customer, the size of deposit or something else. Depending on what they go with, it has the potential to create so many loopholes to avoid creating packages.” Given the difficulty of paying refunds


during the first months of the pandemic, the proposals also raise the prospect of a new category of “extreme extenuating circumstances” to waive the 14-day refund rule. Golding noted: “The interesting point here is how that will be defined. We have a definition of ‘unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’ in the PTRs already. One would assume ‘extenuating circumstances’ would need to be different.” In the same vein, the proposals raise the


prospect of clarifying an organiser’s right to seek refunds from suppliers for cancelled packages. In the meantime, a High Court ruling in October secured just such a refund for On the Beach from Ryanair. *ROGLQJ QRWHG “7KH TXHVWLRQ LQ 2QbWKH


%HDFK Y 5\DQDLU ZDV GRHV 5HJXODWLRQb of the PTRs confer a free-standing right of action for organisers to recover losses caused by third parties? The High Court found it does and in a summary judgment, with the judge deciding the issue did not need to go to a full trial. That was fantastic news for the industry in terms of its ability to recover monies from suppliers where they’ve had to pay out under the PTRs.”


DIGITAL MARKETS, COMPETITION AND CONSUMER BILL The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill (DMCC) is a major piece of legislation due to come into force this year. Golding explained: “The key thing from the industry’s perspective are the new powers to be given to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to enforce consumer law. “Currently when the CMA suspects a


40 Travel Weekly Insight Report 2024 FIGURE 50:


AIRLINE FARES COMPARISON


‘It’s easy to understand cost of flights and to compare airlines’


Don’t know Disagree 6%


20% 17%


+40pt 57% net %pt agree


Neither agree nor disagree


Agree Source: CAA Consumer Survey, October 2022 Base: 3,500 UK adults


breach of consumer law, it faces a long, drawn-out process. The CMA can take criminal and civil actions, but it relies on the courts, which is time-consuming and expensive. Partly as a result, a lot of CMA actions are resolved by seeking undertakings from businesses. “That is going to change. The DMCC


gives the CMA powers to investigate suspected infringements of consumer law, to decide whether there has been a breach and to take action ranging from requiring a business to comply with directions to imposing fines of up to £300,000 or 10% of relevant turnover. “The CMA has had a focus on the


travel industry going back almost a decade. But when it has suspected non- compliance with consumer law, it has been disincentivised from taking enforcement action by the current process. Now it will be able to make its own decisions and levy fines, so it will change how consumer law is enforced. The onus will be on businesses to contest CMA rulings in the courts.” He added: “The government is also


revoking Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations and recreating the legal effects under the DMCC. An area it has said it will consult on is a ban on fake reviews, and a ban on hosting reviews without taking reasonable steps to check they are genuine. A lot of travel businesses host online reviews, so businesses would be obliged to show they had taken reasonable steps to ensure the reviews were genuine.” The government has also promised


MORE than half UK consumers found it ‘easy’ to compare airfares, according to a


CAA survey, despite the government considering regulating ‘drip pricing’ by airlines and others (Figure 50)


a consultation and action on ‘drip pricing’, in particular by airlines. Golding said: “I understand the concern around drip pricing, but many airlines would say, ‘It just reflects the variety of choice.’ Does everything have to go in the upfront price, every possible add-on? If so, how do you present the price in a way that isn’t offputting?” Deloitte audit and assurance director


Tim Robinson noted: “The consumer wants comparability, so it needs to be a realistic price, not a headline price that no one pays in reality.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60