search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
83


1864 Lighthouse (demolished in 1988)


distinctive modern look to it and is a Grade 2 listed building. The original plan suggested that the stone for the Beacon could easily be quarried locally; as it is built of slate rubble, it is likely that this is what happened. The total cost was £523 (£75,000 in today’s money), five times the cost of the new lighthouse, built in the same year also to an octagonal design, probably also by Brereton, and sited on the Kingswear side, above Silver Cove. At 80 ft it is the second tallest mark in the UK; it was also the last Daymark built in the UK, as


works to upgrade Dartmouth’s harbour.


The proposed


Circa 1880. Working coal hulks moored on the Kingswear side of the Dart. The bosses are those in bowler hats. The youngest lad was later manager of the Channel Coaling Co. Photo given by Mr H Pyne Feb 1950


The Daymark from the sea


improvements in navigation capabilities and better maps made them largely redundant. All the works to upgrade Dartmouth’s harbour were


completed by December 1864, and the town’s expectations were high. But the moment had passed, and the prestigious packet services that Dartmouth was hoping for did not materialise: Southampton and Plymouth had prevailed. However, the investment in the port facilities did enable Dartmouth to service the larger steamships needing to top up their coal bunkers before they left for the Atlantic and for the next 50 years, Dartmouth became a bunkering port and in 1875 was the 10th most important coal port in the UK. In February 1868, gales blew the Daymark’s wooden roof off and plans were made to replace it with a brick dome. However, the construction cost of £14 could not be justified, and it was left as it is today – open to the winds.


It still


remains a useful navigational aid from Torbay and Start Bay, being visible once Start Point is rounded in all but poor visibility, but in reality, it was never going to be enough to transform Dartmouth’s fortunes as a port.


© Text Jonathan Turner The Dartmouth History Research Group researches the history of Dartmouth and surrounding villages. If you’re interested, please contact dhrg.enquiries@ dartmouth-history.org.uk.


image courtesy of unsplash.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116