search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech


solvent. The test fluid used for flushing the system was then drained and discarded. Notice that several flushes may be required to completely remove all traces of the cleaning solvent. If solvent is detected in the recirculation system, then the system should be flushed again.


Table 1. Experimental parameters for the Falex MultiSpecimen vane pump setup


Possible test parameters are summarised in Table 1. During each test the temperature, load and speed were accurately controlled, and the measurement of temperatures of oil and test surfaces, as well as frictional torque were continuously monitored and recorded. In order to establish a correlation between Vane pump tests and the cyclic-stress vane-on-flat test, we performed ISO 20763 Conestoga Vickers vane pump tests on a number of hydraulic fluids. The test setup along a schematic of the pump assembly are given in Figure 3. The testing parameters for the Conestoga Vickers vane pump tests are given in Table 2. The wear loss of both the ring and vanes was evaluated by weight loss measurements in an electrobalance.


After tests on both systems, the wear mechanisms are compared by scanning


40


PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.114 page 3


electron microscope (SEM), and the testing parameters of the Falex Multispecimen system were adjusted until the same wear mechanisms were obtained.


Fig 3. (b) components and assembly of Conestoga Vickers vane pump


Table 2. Experimental parameters for ISO 20763 vane pump tests


Fig 3. (a) Conestoga Vickers vane pump tester


Advantages of this prescreening method This methodology allows for in-situ monitoring of the evolution of friction and temperature near the contacting surfaces. When the hydraulic fluid fails, and a change in wear mechanism takes place, this can be identified during the test by the sharp increase of coefficient of friction Figure 4a. The test can thus be stopped and time can be saved. In contrast, the Conestoga vane pump method only gives a wear rate at the end of test, and thus a pass/fail result without further information on the time of failure. The prescreening method furthermore allows for different hydraulic fluids to be compared in terms of frictional performance and evolution Figure 4b.


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.143 FEBRUARY 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76