search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech


* Falex Tribology N.V., Wingepark 23B, B3110, Rotselaar, Belgium ** Falex Corporation, 1020 Airpark Drive, Sugar Grove, IL 60554, USA


State of the art on vane pump testing Hydraulic systems are widely used in the manufacturing, construction, forestry, mining and transportation industries. Over the years, systems for the transmission and distribution of power have become more complicated, their applications more numerous and their operating conditions more demanding. So hydraulic fluids need to get better to match the increasing industrial demand and requirements. Despite a large variety of commercial hydraulic fluids, pump manufacturers and users often have no comparable information on friction and wear properties of these fluids, due to a lack of efficient tribological techniques that simulate accurately the in-field conditions of a pump.


The current state-of-the-art for testing fluids for vane pumps is mainly the Conestoga-Vickers Vane Pump stand (ASTM D7043 - DIN 51389 - ISO 20763) or similar component testers. Standardised pump stands would provide the best possible representation of actual working conditions, but have their practical limitations. Apart from the investment cost of such pump stands, a critical issue is the test duration : 100 hrs for the ASTM D7043 method and 250 hrs for the ISO 20763 method. Also a large quantity of hydraulic fluids per test is needed (30 L for ASTM D7043 and 60 L for ISO 20763). These tests only measure wear


38 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.143 FEBRUARY 2018


losses, no information about frictional behavior of the tribosystem are measured. In 1996, G.E. Totten presented an overview of bench tests for Hydraulic Fluid performance, and came to three important conclusions: 1) none of the obvious laboratory tests (Four Ball test, Pin & Vee Block, SRV, Timken) provided any correlation with the standardised Vane Pump test; 2) a predictive test must reproduce the actual wear mechanism in the hydraulic pump and 3) be sufficiently reproducible. Earlier attempts to use a cyclic stress vane-on-flat methodology with a Falex Multispecimen machine were not satisfactory because the 2nd criterion wasn’t met: the test parameters didn’t reproduce the same wear mechanisms. In this paper, we have revisited the parameters of the cyclic stress vane-on-flat test to simulate the working conditions of a vane pump. A key feature of this approach was to fine-tune experimental conditions and specimens to accelerate wear without changing the wear mechanisms. To achieve this, we compared wear mechanisms and weight losses of the Falex MultiSpecimen vane-on- flat tester with the ones obtained from Conestoga Vickers Vane Pump tests. The outcome is a promising prescreening method that produces a reliable ranking of hydraulic fluids comparable to those of Conestoga tests, but in a significantly shorter test time, using less fluid and with additional information on the frictional behavior of the tribosystem.


PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.114 page 1


Prescreening hydraulic fluids for vane pumps: a ranking method


Emmanuel Georgiou*, Dirk Drees*, Michel De Bilde*, Michael Anderson**


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76