search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ASK THE EXPERTS


Meeting of minds How do virtual meetings alter business practice and travel policy?


days. There are also plenty of platforms on the market ranging from basic free services, such as Skype and Facetime, to more high-end, expensive systems, offered by the likes of Cisco. BBT’s experts explain how they integrate virtual meetings into their wider travel policies and which platforms are suitable for different types of meetings.


T THE BUYER


JEF ROBINSON, global category manager, meetings & events, US software company


FOR MOST VIRTUAL MEETINGS WE HAVE USED Go To Meeting and Go To Webinar. It’s useful for everything from team calls to training sessions and virtual events. There has also been a massive uptake in Skype because it is accessible on a mobile and laptop. Go To Meeting allows up to 100 people on the call and you can dial in via


a phone or VoIP [voice over internet protocol]. You can see a presentation, share the screen, mark up what’s on it with notes and hand over ownership of the screen to somebody else. It is much more collaborative than Go To Webinar, which only allows limited interaction. We very rarely ring each other; we use Go To Meeting and then anybody


can jump on to the call. Many partners use Cisco Webex, particularly for third-party virtual meetings, and occasionally for larger events and confer- ences, we may use professional high-end media streaming services. Our travel policy says we always try to prioritise online communication, rather than travel, but we don’t mention a specific application. For a lot of run-of-the-mill meetings, especially internally, it makes sense


and it is integrated with video streaming, so you can have a presentation on one part of the screen and video streaming on another. If we are using technology rather than travelling then that bypasses our TMC, but I still speak to them two or three times a week and their first inclination is to use Webex. Striking the balance between virtual meetings and face to face depends on


the culture of an organisation, the locations of staff and the type of meetings under consideration. For general virtual meetings for internal staff and business partners the functionality of Skype may be sufficient. For more complex needs, possibly communicating with a larger audience, Go To Webinar or Webex may be more appropriate. Once licences are available, the latter can easily be used to replace internal meetings, which may otherwise involve travel. Nothing beats face to face for the personal touch, which could be business development, negotiation or networking events. But virtual meetings can readily replace that in many circumstances, as the ability to share screens, collaborate, have colleagues join at the last minute, etc, is extremely efficient.


40 BBT March/April 2018


HERE WAS A TIME when video-conferencing technology was of such poor quality that you could spend hours having a virtual meeting with somebody and not even be able to recognise them in the street minutes later. Thankfully technology has moved on, with both audio and visual quality usually excellent these


THE TMC


ANDREW PEROLLS, executive director, Business Travel Direct


IT HAS LONG BEEN PREDICTED that virtual meetings would replace traditional business trips but even though virtual meetings have become much easier and more affordable, they still cannot replace getting to know clients or colleagues socially. However, virtual meetings can be particularly effective for internal meetings, follow-up to actual meetings and ad hoc meetings with customers or sales prospects. They can certainly help companies save time and money. While many organisations know who travels


and how much it costs, they don’t necessarily know why. A TMC can step in here to analyse data and suggest which trips could be replaced with virtual meetings and advise on the options. When travellers are making an online booking


they are shown the cost of a virtual meeting com- pared with the cost of a trip to make them think about the potential savings. TMCs can also help with programmes to get


staff to embrace the new technology and see how it benefits them. With buy-in from senior manage- ment, it can bring about a cultural shift from “we always do things this way” to “this technology helps us to be more productive”. For one-to-one conversations we recommend


using the video option on Whats App (especially as communication is encrypted), Facetime or Skype. Skype for Business is great for a handful of partic- ipants and we like the file-sharing facility. Go To Meeting is easy to use and screen sharing makes it perfect for presentations and training. Cisco’s Telepresence has people appearing on


screens as though they are on the other side of the table, and there is even a whiteboard-sharing facility. Products such as iVent enable companies to hold hybrid meetings combining live events with streamed content or virtual product launches, training and conferences. For a real wow factor we like NH Hotel Group’s


3D holographic technology. It enables conference organisers to project information in 3D and have someone appear virtually on stage.


BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124