INFECTION CONTROL
Uncovering hidden contamination pathways
Despite decades of advances in cleaning, sterilisation, and clinical protocols, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a persistent challenge. While significant progress has been made in controlling surface and instrument-related risks, increasing attention is now being given to the role of the built environment itself, where infrastructure systems such as water, air, and drainage operate continuously and may act as sources of microbial contamination. Here, Jørn Terkelsen, founder and CEO of Dolphin Care, looks at whether infection prevention strategies are addressing all relevant pathways of contamination within clinical environments.
In many healthcare settings, responsibility for infection prevention is divided between clinical teams and estates or facilities departments. While this reflects organisational structure, it may also create gaps in how environmental risks are addressed.
Clinical teams focus on patient-facing interventions such as cleaning, disinfection, and aseptic technique. Meanwhile, infrastructure systems, including ventilation, water systems, and drainage, are often managed with a focus on performance and compliance, rather than microbiological impact. As a result, certain contamination pathways may be
under-recognised. Even in well-managed environments, microbial reservoirs within infrastructure systems may persist and contribute to ongoing contamination.
Water systems and hidden reservoirs Hospital water systems have received increasing attention in recent years, particularly in relation to biofilm formation within plumbing and drainage systems. Biofilms provide a stable environment in which
microorganisms can survive and proliferate, often protected from routine cleaning and disinfection practices. In clinical areas such as endoscope reprocessing rooms, sinks may therefore act as persistent environmental reservoirs. While surface cleaning reduces contamination on visible surfaces, it does not address microbial load within underlying infrastructure. This creates the potential for repeated recontamination of the surrounding environment. Recent work published in the Journal of Hospital Infection has further highlighted the role of sinks as potential sources of environmental contamination. Studies have demonstrated that microorganisms present within drainage systems can be dispersed into the surrounding environment through splash events, including Gram- negative organisms and, in some cases, strains associated with patient infections. These findings reinforce the importance of considering not only visible surfaces but also underlying infrastructure when addressing persistent contamination.
Case study: identifying the source of contamination A clinical investigation in a hospital setting highlighted the importance of looking beyond surfaces and equipment when addressing persistent contamination. Despite thorough cleaning protocols, recurring
microbiological findings prompted further investigation. Initial focus was placed on clinical equipment and procedures, but no clear source could be identified.
Attention then shifted towards the surrounding
infrastructure, including the drainage system. Following installation of UV-C-based water trap technology targeting the drainage system, no further cases were detected over a period exceeding three years. This shifted the focus from clinical processes to
the surrounding infrastructure as the likely source of contamination, illustrating how hidden reservoirs may influence outcomes in ways that are not immediately visible.
September 2026 Health Estate Journal 79
Above: Clinical sink environment used during manual cleaning procedures, where drainage systems may act as persistent environmental reservoirs.
Left: UV-C-based intervention installed within the drainage infrastructure beneath a clinical sink.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136