search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEALTHCARE DESIGN


Better design for clinical isolation


Jamie Brewster, architect at MJ Medical, has spent the last 25 years designing clinical spaces for hospitals around the world. When he was diagnosed with leukaemia in 2020, a three-week stint in hospital isolation for stem-cell transplantation led him to question every room he had ever designed. He is now on a mission to understand others’ experience of clinical isolation and to figure out how, through better UK design standards, we can improve them. In this piece, he shares his own experience of isolation and what his initial research has taught him.


What is an inpatient isolation bedroom? Is it not essentially the same as any inpatient bedroom, but with a small lobby attached to regulate air quality? In reality this is not the case – a conventional bedroom and an isolation bedroom are, in fact, very different.


Dealing with infection risk Isolating patients has been a method of treating disease for many years. Since Old Testament times and the establishment of leper colonies, isolation has been seen as an effective means of dealing with infection risk. Sometimes, patients are subject to ‘source isolation’ because they present a hazard to others, for example because they carry a highly infectious disease such as Ebola virus or because they present a radiation risk due to iodine 131 treatment for thyroid problems. In other cases, the patient may be severely immunocompromised and needs protective isolation from all sources of infection. In either case, the term ‘isolation’ is key and perhaps indicates the main difference between this type of inpatient room and other more conventional types. Isolation demands removing the patient from almost all


human contact, often for a considerable period of time. It is true that there are numerous examples of patients remaining in hospital bedrooms for extended periods. The difference with isolation is that the patient is confined. Here, regardless as to whether the patient feels well or extremely ill, they must remain within the room for the duration of their treatment. Unlike a patient in a standard bedroom, their choice to vacate the room for a period is not available. It is common for an isolated patient to have to spend many weeks residing in a single small bedroom, very often with relatively minimal social contact with others.


An architect/patient perspective In 2020, I was admitted to an isolation bedroom after being diagnosed with leukaemia. Spending three weeks in isolation receiving a stem-cell transplant highlighted just how different it was from the typical inpatient experience. The combination of a gruelling treatment burden with fear and social separation created a unique set of factors that maybe are not fully considered by designers. My combined experience as both a healthcare


architect and a patient led me to review the design of this type of hospital room and also the guidance used by designers. How have designers tackled this type of space in recent hospital developments, and how has NHS design guidance helped and informed them? Following my time as an inpatient, the word experience has emerged as the most important factor and one which


I now realise has been somewhat absent in my own and other designers’ approach to healthcare design. While ergonomic, technical, and aesthetic matters are important, I now realise that understanding human sensory and experiential factors is also critical. My patient experience taught me that in the context of ‘person-centred care’, where clinicians might now be encouraged to ask, ‘what matters to you?’ rather than ‘what is the matter with you?’, there is an equal need for designers to adopt a more ‘person-centred’ approach. The question ‘what will it feel like to live in this space?’ is now just as important as asking ‘what will the space look like and how will it perform?’. The drive to address these issues has motivated me to undertake a PhD research project to understand the experiential needs of the immunocompromised inpatient and to explore how they might be addressed through design. Finding solutions to these issues may have the potential to influence future design guidance and, through tackling the needs of a unique and complex patient group, also provide some answers for other patients whose needs are perhaps not as acute but whose experiential response to space is just as important.


Practicalities of isolation – the design guidance The most common need for patient isolation is related to treatment for blood cancers and the transplant of stem-cells. The pre-conditioning, chemotherapy-induced


September 2026 Health Estate Journal 45


Designers should ask themselves how it would feel to live in the space.


AdobeStock / ImageFlow


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136